Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40051581›Full record

ReviewPsychedelic medicine (New Rochelle, N.Y.)2024

A Plea for Nuance: Should People with a Family History of Bipolar Disorder Be Excluded from Clinical Trials of Psilocybin Therapy?

Amanda E Downey, Ellen R Bradley, Anna S Lerche, Aoife O'Donovan, Andrew D Krystal, Joshua Woolley

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Psychedelic medicine (New Rochelle, N.Y.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amanda E DowneyDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5206-7798
Ellen R BradleyDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Anna S LercheDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Aoife O'DonovanDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Andrew D KrystalDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Joshua WoolleyDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.

Funding

CSRD VA IK4 CX002090
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: As the field of psychedelic therapy grows, it is vital to consider who can safely engage with psilocybin therapy. In most modern clinical trials of psilocybin therapy, individuals with a family history of bipolar disorder (BD) have been excluded from participation because of their genetic predisposition for developing BD. Review: Case studies and survey data shed light on the risks of psilocybin therapy among those with a family history of BD in the absence of data from modern clinical trials. We review existing evidence that could inform risk stratification for these individuals, including genetic proximity to the affected relative, BD type, age at onset in the relative, and participant age. Hypothesizing that the risk of developing BD may predict the risk of developing serious adverse events when engaging with psilocybin therapy, we propose a risk stratification tool to be utilized when determining the relative risks of psilocybin therapy to those with a family history of BD in the context of clinical trials. Conclusion: Balancing the need for effective treatments against the potential for serious adverse events in those undergoing psilocybin therapy with a family history of BD, we argue for caution in psychedelic clinical trials but not outright exclusion of these individuals. Our risk stratification tool allows for more nuanced inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Indexed as

bipolar disordermaniapsilocybinpsychosis

Identifiers

PMID40051581
PMCPMC11658676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.