Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40051580›Full record

ArticlePsychedelic medicine (New Rochelle, N.Y.)2024

Perceived Risk of Trying Lysergic Acid Diethylamide in the United States from 2015 to 2019: Are Americans Assessing Lysergic Acid Diethylamide's Risk Profile More Favorably?

Brian S Barnett, Akhil Anand, Elizabeth N Dewey, Darron Smith, Sandeep M Nayak, David Bruckman, Jeremy Weleff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychedelic medicine (New Rochelle, N.Y.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Ensuring Access to Psychedelic-Assisted Therapy in Rural Communities.Psychedelic medicine (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Brian S BarnettDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8963-5701
Akhil AnandDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4132-2690
Elizabeth N DeweyDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Darron SmithDepartment of Sociology, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Sandeep M NayakCenter for Psychedelic and Consciousness Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6832-0639
David BruckmanDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Jeremy WeleffDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8071-7412

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Though lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) use is rising in the United States amid expanding research into the therapeutic potential of psychedelics, little scholarly work exists on whether perceived risk of trying LSD (prLSD) is changing or factors influencing prLSD among the general public. Therefore, we sought to investigate changes in prLSD from 2015 to 2019 and identify characteristics associated with prLSD among respondents to the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH). Methods: Using NDSUH data from 2015 to 2019, we investigated correlates of and temporal trends in prLSD, reporting results for the entire sample, as well under age 18 (<18) and age 18 and older (18+) subgroups. Orthogonal polynomial contrasts were used to evaluate trends across survey years. Multivariable models were constructed to identify factors associated with prLSD. Results: On multivariable modeling for respondents age 18+, lower prLSD had statistically significant associations with later survey year, personal LSD use, younger age, higher education level, male gender, identifying as a sexual minority, past year psychological distress, and other factors. Higher prLSD was associated with identifying as Black or Hispanic, past year suicide attempt, and having children in the home. Notable differences in the age <18 subgroup were no association between prLSD and identifying as Hispanic and male gender being associated with higher prLSD. From 2015 to 2019, there was a statistically significant linear decreasing trend in proportion of respondents who perceived "great" risk in trying LSD [from 70.5% to 64.8%; ( Conclusions: We observed differences in prLSD among subgroups, suggesting that factors such as age, gender, race, ethnicity, and personal history of LSD may be related to prLSD. Overall, Americans appear to be assessing LSD's risk profile more favorably in recent years, though most Americans still perceive great risk in trying LSD.

Indexed as

LSDlysergic acidNational Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH)psychedelicsrisk perceptionsurvey

Identifiers

PMID40051580
PMCPMC11613523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.