Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40051471›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of public health2025

The Views of Syrian Immigrant Women on Family Planning and Unplanned Pregnancy: A Qualitative Study.

Eda Yakıt Ak, Özden Tandoğan, Ergül Aslan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eda Yakıt AkDicle University Atatürk Health Services Vocational School, Diyarbakır, Türkiye.
Özden TandoğanIstanbul Arel University Faculty of Health Sciences Department of Nursing, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Ergül AslanIstanbul University-Cerrahpasa Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Department of Women's Health and Diseases Nursing, Istanbul, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to determine the views of Syrian immigrant women on family planning and unplanned pregnancies. Methods: The study was conducted using a phenomenological design, one of the qualitative research methods. The study data were collected using a semi-structured questionnaire, and an "inductive content analysis technique" was used to analyze the data. Results: The study identified four main themes. The first theme, "The Meaning of Having Children," reveals that women view children as the essence of their lives and as a source of security for the future. The second theme, "Opinions on the Number of Children," highlights that financial concerns and pressure from family and the surrounding environment play a significant role in decisions regarding the number of children. The third theme, "Views on Family Planning," shows that while women are aware of family planning methods, their use is often limited due to economic, cultural, and religious factors. Lastly, the fourth theme, "Views on Unplanned Pregnancies," indicates that unplanned pregnancies are commonly regarded as "God's will," and abortion is generally deemed inappropriate due to religious beliefs. Conclusion: Cultural, religious, and economic factors significantly affect women's access to and use of family planning services.

Indexed as

Emigrants and ImmigrantsFamily Planning ServicesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePregnancy, UnplannedAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansPregnancyQualitative ResearchSurveys and QuestionnairesSyriaYoung Adultcurettagefamily planningmigrationunplanned pregnancywomen

Identifiers

PMID40051471
PMCPMC11882361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.