ArticleFuture internet2024
Human-AI Collaboration for Remote Sighted Assistance: Perspectives from the LLM Era.
Article in Future internet, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stargardt's Connected Research Network Inaugural Meeting: Landscape Review and Horizon Scanning of Stargardt Disease.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Review
- Enhancing the Travel Experience for People with Visual Impairments through Multimodal Interaction: NaviGPT, A Real-Time AI-Driven Mobile Navigation System.GROUP ... : proceedings of the International ACM SIGCHI Conference on Supporting Group Work. ACM SIGCHI International Conference on Supporting Group Work · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Remote sighted assistance (RSA) has emerged as a conversational technology aiding people with visual impairments (VI) through real-time video chat communication with sighted agents. We conducted a literature review and interviewed 12 RSA users to understand the technical and navigational challenges faced by both agents and users. The technical challenges were categorized into four groups: agents' difficulties in orienting and localizing users, acquiring and interpreting users' surroundings and obstacles, delivering information specific to user situations, and coping with poor network connections. We also presented 15 real-world navigational challenges, including 8 outdoor and 7 indoor scenarios. Given the spatial and visual nature of these challenges, we identified relevant computer vision problems that could potentially provide solutions. We then formulated 10 emerging problems that neither human agents nor computer vision can fully address alone. For each emerging problem, we discussed solutions grounded in human-AI collaboration. Additionally, with the advent of large language models (LLMs), we outlined how RSA can integrate with LLMs within a human-AI collaborative framework, envisioning the future of visual prosthetics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.