ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2025
Orthopaedic fracture site and wound healing risk among end-stage renal disease patients undergoing open reduction internal fixation: A database analysis.
Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Higher mortality and distinct complications after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in dialysis patients, despite improvements over prior decade: A national inpatient study.Journal of craniovertebral junction & spineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The aims of this study are to 1) identify incidence rate of fracture occurrence among end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients requiring open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) stratified by anatomic site and 2) assess the risk of perioperative wound complications among ESRD fracture patients requiring ORIF compared to non-ESRD patients. Materials and methods: This retrospective cohort study utilized the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database, covering the period from January 2002 to December 2014, to examine patients over 18 years of age who underwent ORIF for extremity fractures in the United States. Two-sample Z-tests were employed to assess differences in patient demographics, comorbidities, and anatomical fracture sites between ESRD and non-ESRD cohorts. Additionally, multivariate logistic regression was used to examine differences in specific wound complications between these cohorts, and ANOVA tests assessed the effect of dialysis modality on wound complication risk. Results: A total of 867,378 patients undergoing ORIF, with 7055 (0.8 %) reported ESRD. ESRD patients had a significantly higher incidence of femur fractures compared to those without ESRD (61.9 % vs. 42.1 %, p < 0.05). Furthermore, ESRD patients had a 1.55, 2.14, and 2.57 times increased odds of wound complication (p = 0.001), wound dehiscence (p = 0.003), and non-healing wound (p = 0.007) compared to patients without ESRD, respectively. No significant differences were found in the impact of dialysis modality on overall wound complication, wound dehiscence, non-healing wounds, seroma, and wound infection rates (p > 0.05 for all). Conclusions: ESRD patients are predisposed to more frequent fractures, particularly of the femur, than those without ESRD. Furthermore, it underscores the increased incidence of perioperative wound complications, such as infections and delayed healing, in patients with ESRD undergoing ORIF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.