ArticleAJPM focus2025
Preference for Long-Acting Injectable PrEP Compared With Daily Oral PrEP Among Transgender Women in the U.S.: Findings From a Multisite Cohort.
Article in AJPM focus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Applying Behavioral Economics to HIV Prevention: Development of a Novel PrEP Demand Task.AIDS and behavior · 2026Article
- Long-Acting Injectable Cabotegravir HIV PrEP Uptake, Adherence, and Persistence in Two Large US Integrated Healthcare Systems.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2026Article
- Long-Acting Injectable Cabotegravir Use and Persistence Over 2 Years.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Long-Acting PrEP for People With High Vulnerability to HIV Acquisition in Brazil: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2026Article
- Lenacapavir for HIV Prevention in Africa: Opportunities, Barriers, and Policy Priorities.Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS CareReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use among transgender women in the U.S. has not reached levels optimal to change the trajectory of the HIV epidemic owing to multilevel barriers. Long-acting injectable PrEP received Food and Drug Administration approval in 2021 and may potentially address some of the barriers experienced in initiating and adhering to daily oral PrEP (e.g., pill fatigue, medication storage). However, preferences for long-acting injectable PrEP compared with daily oral PrEP have not been well studied among transgender women. Methods: The authors analyzed data collected from transgender women not living with HIV in eastern and southern U.S. in 2020-2022. Using multivariable Poisson regression with robust standard errors, the authors estimated prevalence ratios and 95% CIs for factors associated with preference for long-acting injectable PrEP. Results: The study sample (N=789) was racially and ethnically diverse, with 42.6% identifying as Black, Latina, and/or multiracial and 12% using daily oral PrEP. Fifty-eight percent preferred long-acting injectable PrEP to daily oral PrEP. In multivariable regression analyses, preference for long-acting injectable PrEP was associated with residence in Midwest (reference group=Northeast, adjusted prevalence ratio=1.33; 95% CI=1.10, 1.60), current PrEP indications (adjusted prevalence ratio=1.14; 95% CI=1.01, 1.30), and history of gender-affirming hormone injection (adjusted prevalence ratio=1.36; 95% CI=1.18, 1.57). Conclusions: Transgender women may prefer long-acting injectable PrEP to daily oral PrEP, especially those with current PrEP indications and experience with gender-affirming hormone injections. Increasing availability and access to long-acting injectable PrEP may improve PrEP uptake in transgender women, particularly in combination with other interventions to reduce multilevel PrEP barriers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.