ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025
Antiplatelet strategy for patients with acute coronary syndrome and chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Personalized Antithrombotic Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review of Risk-Stratified Approaches.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2026Pooled it
- Comprehensive Review of Antiplatelet Therapy in Secondary Prevention of Myocardial Infarction: Mechanisms, Clinical Evidence, and Future Directions.Cardiovascular therapeutics · 2026Review
- Exploring prognostic factors on vascular outcomes among maintenance dialysis patients and establishing a prognosis prediction model using machine learning methods.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Bleeding in Antiplatelet Therapy: A Narrative Review of Clinical Evidence and the Roles of Pharmacists and Nurses.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients with both acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) face heightened risks of adverse cardiovascular events and bleeding. An optimal antiplatelet strategy for this patient population is needed. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate comparative advantages of clopidogrel vs. ticagrelor in the choice of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) strategies for patients with ACS combined with CKD, while also exploring the appropriate duration of DAPT in the presence of CKD. Relevant studies were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and major bleeding. Data were analyzed using RevMan 5.4.1, and STATA 14 was used to assess publication bias. This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024593764). Results: Six studies involving 9,947 patients met the inclusion criteria. Compared with clopidogrel, ticagrelor was associated with a reduced risk of MACE (RR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.80-0.99; Conclusions: In patients with ACS combined with CKD, ticagrelor-based DAPT has advantages over clopidogrel-based DAPT, which is associated with a lower incidence of MACE. And shortening the duration of DAPT does not improve clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.