Comparing methods for plasma HDV RNA quantification in bulevirtide-treated and untreated patients with HDV.

Background & Aims: Accurate HDV RNA quantification is crucial for diagnosis and management of chronic hepatitis delta (CHD), yet a significant variability between assays exists. We compared three methods to quantify HDV RNA levels in untreated and bulevirtide (BLV)-treated patients with CHD. Methods: Frozen plasma from untreated and BLV-treated patients with CHD were tested in a single-center retrospective study using three different assays: Robogene 2.0 HDV RNA Quantification Kit 2.0 (Roboscreen GmbH; limit of detection [LOD] 6 IU/ml on 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System [Applied Biosystem]), EurobioPlex HDV PCR quantitative kit (Eurobio Scientific; LOD 100 IU/m) on CFX96™ real-time PCR detection system [Bio-Rad]), and AltoStar HDV RT-PCR RUO Kit 1.5 (Altona Diagnostics; estimated LOD <10 IU/ml) on the AltoStar®AM16. Results: Overall, 431 plasma samples from 130 patients with CHD (69 untreated and 61 BLV-treated) were studied. Compared with Robogene 2.0, EurobioPlex reported higher HDV RNA levels (3.78 [0.70-7.99] Conclusions: HDV RNA levels quantified by EurobioPlex and AltoStar were 1 and 0.5 logs higher than those quantified by Robogene 2.0, respectively. HDV RNA undetectability rates during BLV treatment were assay-dependent. Impact and implications: Management and diagnosis of chronic hepatitis delta (CHD) require standardized tests for HDV RNA quantification. Quantification of HDV RNA is significantly influenced by the quantification method, with EurobioPlex detecting approximatively 1 log and AltoStar 0.5 log IU/ml more than Robogene 2.0, respectively. The HDV RNA undetectability rates during BLV monotherapy significantly differed among assays. These findings are of clinical relevance as patients who achieve negative viremia during BLV monotherapy might be entitled to stop therapy successfully.