ArticleVascular specialist international2025
Simulation-based Central Venous Catheter Insertion Training Increases Comfort Amongst Residents.
Article in Vascular specialist international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of the simulation-based Airway and Catheter Cannulation Education-from Starters to Specialists (ACCESS) program for critical care procedures.Journal of trauma and injury · 2026Article
- Barriers to optimal central venous catheter training: a qualitative study of physician experiences.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Simulation-based training for fascial plane blocks: A scoping review mapped to the Kirkpatrick evaluation framework.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Central venous catheter (CVC) insertion is a fundamental skill required for trainees to become proficient. Simulation-based training (SBT) has been shown to improve trainees' CVC insertion performance effectively. However, implementing a CVC curriculum requires substantial costs and resources. Currently, there is a lack of validated CVC curricula that institutions can adopt as frameworks. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of our institution's CVC simulation curriculum in improving residents' confidence and comfort with CVC insertion and management. Materials and Methods: First-year residents (n=118) participated in SBT between 2017 and 2023. Among them, 57 (48%) participants completed surveys before training and 6 months post-training to assess changes in comfort levels across various aspects of CVC insertion. Survey responses were analyzed to evaluate the overall changes in comfort by year and items. Results: Overall comfort increased from 42.1% before training to 81.3% after training (P<0.01), with notable improvements in nonprocedural aspects. Comfort with performing the unsupervised procedure increased by 16.7% (P<0.05) but remained low post-training (29.6%). Conclusion: These findings suggest that the curriculum effectively enhances residents' comfort, particularly in nonprocedural aspects, but only partially prepares them for unsupervised CVC insertions. This indicates a gap in procedural skill acquisition despite the overall positive trends. Implementing a similar CVC curriculum may help institutions reduce CVC insertion-associated complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.