Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40051243›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of primatology2025

Comparing the Performances of Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and Gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) in Two Self-Awareness Tasks.

Lisa-Claire Vanhooland, Constanze Mager, Aurora Teuben, Thomas Bugnyar, Jorg J M Massen

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of primatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Body Size Awareness and Modular Self-Representation in Reedfish (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lisa-Claire VanhoolandDepartment of Behavioral and Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-6453-1300
Constanze MagerRoyal Burgers´ Zoo, Arnhem, the Netherlands.
Aurora TeubenUniversity of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Thomas BugnyarDepartment of Behavioral and Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Jorg J M MassenAnimal Behaviour and Cognition, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF W 1262This study was supported by a Marietta Blau Grant from the Austrian Agency for Education and Internationalisation (OeAD) and the Austrian Science Fund 10.55776/W1262)This study was supported by a Marietta Blau Grant from the Austrian Agency for Education and Internationalisation (OeAD) and the Austrian Science Fund (DOI
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-awareness has most commonly been studied in nonhuman animals by implementing mirror self-recognition (MSR) tasks. The validity of such tasks as a stand-alone method has, however, been debated due to their high interindividual variation (including in species deemed self-aware like chimpanzees), their reliance on only one sensory modality, their discrete outcomes (i.e., pass/fail) and, in general, questionned regarding their ability to assess self-awareness. Therefore, a greater variety of methods that assess different aspects of the self, while simultaneously contributing to a more gradualist view of self-awareness, would be desirable. One such method is the body-as-obstacle task (BAO), testing for another dimension of body self-awareness. The ability to understand one's own body as an obstacle to the completion of a desired action emerges in young children at approximately the same age as mirror self-recognition, suggesting a shared mental representation. Whereas recently some studies showed body self-awareness in nonhuman animals, so far, outside of children no studies have compared how the performances of individuals relate between these two tasks. Therefore, here we study both a MSR and a BAO task in chimpanzees and gorillas. We chose these species particularly because evidence for MSR in chimpanzees is well established, whereas results for gorillas have been mixed, which has been attributed to the study design of MSR tasks, and for which a BAO task might thus provide more conclusive evidence. We find that although only some chimpanzees showed evidence for mirror self-recognition, thus replicating previous findings on interspecies differences in MSR, chimpanzees and gorillas performed equally well in the BAO task. Yet, we further found no correlation between the individuals' performances in both tasks. We discuss the implications of these findings for the interpretation of the results of BAO tasks as a possible alternative paradigm for the study of self-awareness in non-human animals.

Indexed as

AwarenessGorilla gorillaPan troglodytesSelf ConceptAnimalsFemaleMaleRecognition, Psychologybody‐as‐obstacle taskbody imagebody schemabody self‐awarenessmirror self‐recognition

Identifiers

PMID40051243
PMCPMC11886032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.