ArticleClinical and experimental dental research2025
Assessing the Long-Term Survival of Dental Implants in A Retrospective Analysis: Immediate Versus Delayed Placement.
Article in Clinical and experimental dental research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Safety and feasibility of immediate implant placement in diabetic patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Biomedical reports · 2026Article
- Staged Implant Rehabilitation Following Endodontic Treatment Failure of a Maxillary First Molar: A Case Report.Cureus · 2026Article
- Article
- Impact of interventional periodontal therapy on the longevity of failing dental implants: A retrospective analysis.Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal · 2026Article
- Wide-thread implant macrogeometry and immediate implant placement: A systematic review of primary stability, marginal bone loss, and survival outcomes.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2026Review
- Current treatment concepts in implantology in oral and maxillofacial surgery in Germany.International journal of implant dentistry · 2026Article
- Immediate Loading of Implants Placed Immediately in Fresh Sockets: A 10-Year Single-Arm Prospective Case Series Follow-Up.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis large-scale retrospective study aims to evaluate and compare the long-term survival rates of dental implants placed immediately after tooth extraction (type 1) versus those placed at a later stage (types 2, 3, and 4). Additionally, it examines how patient characteristics and implant site conditions influence the choice of implant placement. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study retrospectively analyzed patient data from 10 university dental clinics between 2011 and 2022 and examined dental implant treatment outcomes. Patient information, including age, sex, ethnicity, race, smoking, and medical status, was analyzed.
resultsRecords of 20,842 patients with 50,333 dental implants inserted between 2011 and 2022 were analyzed. The multivariate analysis resulted in significant differences for age, ethnicity, race, gender, and asthma. A 98.4% survival rate for dental implants placed immediately following extraction and a 98.6% survival rate for those placed in fully healed sockets were recorded. The type of implant placement (immediate vs. delayed) showed no significant effect on implant outcome.
conclusionImmediate implant placement resulted in high survival rates with delayed implants inserted into healed sites. Both immediate and delayed implant placements are viable therapeutic approaches demonstrating predictable outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.