Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40051135›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of case reports2025

Two Cases of Revisional Urinary Diversion from Ureterocutaneostomy to Ileal Conduit: A Staged Urinary Diversion Strategy for Patients with Bladder Cancer in the Targeted and Immunotherapy Era.

Yuki Tanaka, Hideki Takeshita, Kazuki Yokota, Sonin Chon, Kenta Fujii, Ayano Ishida, Masahiro Arai, Kojiro Tachibana, Shoichi Nagamoto, Sachi Kitayama and 3 more

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Yuki TanakaDepartment of Urology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Kawagoe, Saitama, Japan.ORCID 0009-0004-2146-8830
Hideki TakeshitaDepartment of Urology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Kawagoe, Saitama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1512-6904
Kazuki YokotaDepartment of Urology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Kawagoe, Saitama, Japan.
Sonin ChonDepartment of Urology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Kawagoe, Saitama, Japan.
Kenta FujiiDepartment of Urology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Kawagoe, Saitama, Japan.
Ayano IshidaDepartment of Urology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Kawagoe, Saitama, Japan.ORCID 0009-0005-5676-3386
Masahiro AraiDepartment of Urology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Kawagoe, Saitama, Japan.
Kojiro TachibanaDepartment of Urology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Kawagoe, Saitama, Japan.ORCID 0009-0007-2129-297X
Shoichi NagamotoDepartment of Urology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Kawagoe, Saitama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0583-814X
Sachi KitayamaDepartment of Urology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Kawagoe, Saitama, Japan.ORCID 0009-0003-1930-1436
Yohei OkadaDepartment of Urology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Kawagoe, Saitama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9050-471X
Akihiro YanoDepartment of Urology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Kawagoe, Saitama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8453-2474
Kawakami SatoruDepartment of Urology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Kawagoe, Saitama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6319-3821

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Cutaneous ureterostomy (CU) is a commonly used urinary diversion procedure, particularly for patients with poor prognosis, such as those with advanced cancer, a single kidney, or older age. CU is technically easier and faster to perform than other procedures, such as ileal conduit and ileal neobladder, as it does not involve the intestines, thus reducing the risk of postoperative intestinal complications and metabolic abnormalities. However, CU has several drawbacks, including difficulty in achieving a catheter-free status, frequent urinary tract infections, and concerns about long-term renal function, which can negatively impact a patient's quality of life. Recent advancements in the treatment of advanced metastatic urothelial cancer, particularly with immune checkpoint inhibitors and antibody-drug conjugates, have significantly improved the prognosis of patients with urothelial carcinoma. As a result, some patients who underwent CU and were initially considered to have poor prognosis achieved long-term remission. For these patients, the next goal is to establish a stable urinary diversion method that minimizes management effort and reduces the risk of infection and renal dysfunction. CASE REPORT This report presents 2 cases of revisional urinary diversion from CU to ileal conduit in patients with locally advanced bladder cancer who initially underwent CU and achieved long-term remission with pembrolizumab. Both patients achieved catheter-free status and preserved renal function postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS These cases highlight the potential benefits of staged urinary diversion in improving the quality of life of bladder cancer survivors in an era of targeted immunotherapy.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Transitional CellUreterostomyUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsUrinary DiversionHumansImmunotherapyReoperation

Identifiers

PMID40051135
PMCPMC11896004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.