Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40051090›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2025

Safety and effectiveness of the anti-amyloid monoclonal antibody (mAb) drug lecanemab for early Alzheimer's disease: The pharmacovigilance perspective.

Amy Bobbins, Miranda Davies, Elizabeth Lynn, Debabrata Roy, Alison Yeomans, Saad A W Shakir

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Editorial: Real-World Outcomes of Disease-Modifying Therapies Highlight the Need for Diagnostic Biomarkers in Early Alzheimer's Disease.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amy BobbinsDrug Safety Research Unit, Southampton, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7587-4130
Miranda DaviesDrug Safety Research Unit, Southampton, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2949-8378
Elizabeth LynnDrug Safety Research Unit, Southampton, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3905-1046
Debabrata RoyDrug Safety Research Unit, Southampton, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2803-6323
Alison YeomansDrug Safety Research Unit, Southampton, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9125-0379
Saad A W ShakirDrug Safety Research Unit, Southampton, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4084-297X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of humanized IgG1 anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies, such as lecanemab, provides a promising novel treatment pathway with potential disease-modifying effects for patients with early Alzheimer's disease (AD). Lecanemab, which gained marketing approval by the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) in July 2023, has since been approved in multiple countries, including the United Kingdom (UK). The decision by the UK's Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) to approve lecanemab in August 2024 followed similar regulatory decisions in the US and Japan. However, at the time of approval, the decision contrasted with that of the European Medicine Agency (EMA) in July 2024. Subsequently, the EMA recommended the marketing approval of lecanemab in November 2024 following a re-examination of further data submitted by the Marketing Authorisation Holder. The UK's National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has not recommended lecanemab for use in early AD amid concerns, including treatment cost and the translation of efficacy outcomes into clinically meaningful improvement. The risks of serious adverse events (SAEs), including amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA), have also emerged from clinical trial data with a concern for the potential for rare, life-threatening events. This narrative review discusses the requirement for a robust method of monitoring the safety and effectiveness of lecanemab in the real-world clinical setting considering recent regulatory decisions. Additionally, the need to evaluate proposed risk minimization measures (RMMs) is discussed considering the resource constraints of healthcare systems, such as those faced by the UK's National Health Service (NHS).

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAmyloid beta-PeptidesDrug ApprovalHumansPharmacovigilanceUnited KingdomAmyloid beta-PeptidesAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAlzheimer's diseaseanti‐amyloid monoclonal antibodiesbenefit–risk profiledementialecanemab

Identifiers

PMID40051090
PMCPMC12035590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.