Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40051051›Full record

ArticleDialogues in clinical neuroscience2025

Societal perspectives on psychedelics use in clinical context: Development of Concerns and Openness towards Psychedelic Scale (COPS).

Paweł Holas, Justyna Kamińska, Marcin Zajenkowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dialogues in clinical neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Paweł HolasFaculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4210-3396
Justyna KamińskaFaculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Marcin ZajenkowskiFaculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8669-4231

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPsychedelics are gaining recognition for their therapeutic potential in mental health treatment, yet societal attitudes remain divided, influenced by both skepticism and curiosity. This study aimed to develop and validate a scale assessing attitudes toward psychedelics.

methodsStudy 1 (n = 1000, convenience sample) explored the factor structure, identifying two dimensions: Openness toward Psychedelics and Concerns toward Psychedelics. Study 2 (n = 843, representative Polish sample) confirmed the scale's validity.

resultsThe Concerns factor negatively correlated with meaning in life, while the Openness factor was positively associated with openness to experience, agreeableness, conscientiousness, mindfulness, meaning in life, and nature-relatedness. These associations suggest that individuals with greater openness and psychological flexibility may hold more favorable views on psychedelics. DISCUSSION: The Concerns and Openness towards Psychedelics Scale (COPS) is a psychometrically sound tool for assessing attitudes toward psychedelics. Its meaningful correlations with established psychological constructs underscore its utility in research and public health. By providing insight into societal perceptions, COPS may help inform discussions on psychedelic therapy, policy, and education, ultimately fostering a more nuanced understanding of their potential benefits and risks.

Indexed as

HallucinogensPublic OpinionAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPolandPsychometricsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultHallucinogensConcerns of PsychedelicsOpenness towards PsychedelicsPsychedelicspsychometric validationscalesocietal attitudes

Identifiers

PMID40051051
PMCPMC11892042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.