ArticleHemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis2025
Hemodialysis Nonattendance: Patient Characteristics and Outcomes in a Single Renal Center in North West England.
Article in Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Psychosocial factors in patients who miss hemodialysis sessions: a single-center retrospective review.Renal failure · 2026Article
- Hemodialysis Nonattendance: Patient Characteristics and Outcomes in a Single Renal Center in North West England.Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionNonattendance for prescribed hemodialysis (HD) sessions is a form of nonadherence that compromises the delivery of life-sustaining HD therapy and is associated with severe morbidity and mortality. In this study, we aimed to assess the characteristics and outcomes of HD nonattenders in a single renal center in the North West of England.
methodsHD patients followed by the renal team at our unit between December 2020 and September 2022 were included in this study. Dialysis nonattendance data were retrieved from the incident reports (DATIX) between December 2020 and November 2022, excluding dialysis nonattendance due to concurrent hospitalization. The cohort was split into group 1: no dialysis nonattendance; group 2: two or fewer dialysis nonattendances; and group 3: more than two dialysis nonattendances for comparative analysis. All patients were followed up for outcomes including all-cause mortality, transplantation, and hospitalizations until the study endpoint date of 12/31/2023. Predictors of dialysis nonattendance were identified using logistic regression.
resultsOf the 464 patients, dialysis nonattendance was noted in 149 (32%) patients, of which 79 (17%) had two dialysis nonattendance episodes and 70 (15%) had more than two dialysis nonattendance episodes. Over a median follow-up of 35 months, patients in group 3 had a higher hospitalization episode (4 vs. 1 day, p < 0.001) and lower kidney transplantation rates (4.3% vs. 13%, p = 0.038) compared to patients in group 1. In multivariate regression analysis, younger age (OR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.95-0.98; p = 0.001), history of smoking (OR: 2.01; 95% CI: 1.12-3.62; p = 0.019), alcohol excess history (OR: 3.49; 95% CI: 1.87-6.49; p < 0.001) and history of mental health illness (OR: 3.01; 95% CI: 1.61-5.62; p = 0.001) were significant predictors of dialysis nonattendance.
conclusionSkipping HD is a common phenomenon associated with mental health issues and is associated with increased morbidity. Further research is required to understand the psychosocial determinants of nonadherence and effective models of intervention developed to improve outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.