ArticleBMC psychology2025
Romantic relationship status and internalized homophobia in LGB individuals: a parallel mediation model examining the roles of gender and coming out status.
Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo examine the parallel mediating effects of social networking site use and self-esteem on the internalization of homophobia among LGB individuals, with a focus on variations across gender and coming out status.
methodsA sample of 657 homosexual and bisexual individuals (mean age: 22.81 ± 6.15 years) was recruited through online social media platforms. This study examined romantic relationship status, coming out status, and the use of social networking sites. It also assessed internalized homophobia using the Internalized Homophobia Scale (IHS), social network site engagement with the Social Network Site Intensity Scale (SNSIS), and self-esteem using the Self-Esteem Scale (SES). SPSS PROCESS was used to examine the parallel mediation model, while Amos was employed to analyze the moderated mediation model.
resultsThe social networking site use and self-esteem serve as parallel mediators in the relationship between romantic relationship status and the internalized homophobia. The mediating effect accounted for 23.75% and 21.88% of the total effect, respectively. Gender acts as a mediator in the pathways involving social networking site use and self-esteem, while coming out status mediates each component of these pathways. The romantic relationship status of LGB individuals is linked to internalized homophobia. Social networking site use and self-esteem act as parallel mediators in their relationship, while gender and coming out status playing a moderating role.
conclusionsThis study sheds light on the intricate factors influencing internalized homophobia among LGB individuals, emphasizing the mediating roles of social networking site usage and self-esteem, along with the moderating effects of gender and coming out status. The findings underscore the importance of fostering inclusive environments that support self-expression and reduce discrimination against LGB individuals. Furthermore, this study suggests directions for future research, including the use of longitudinal designs, the detailed categorization of romantic relationship statuses, and deeper exploration of psychological and behavioral differences across various LGB identities. By addressing these limitations, future studies can offer a more nuanced understanding of internalized homophobia and contribute to the development of effective intervention and prevention strategies for this vulnerable population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.