ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2025
Associations between sepsis occurrence, hemoglobin level and mortality in patients with non-trauma hemorrhagic brain injuries: trajectory-based analysis.
Article in European journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Electrolyte trajectory-based subphenotypes and their association with hospital length of stay in prostate cancer patients.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- Association between hemoglobin-to-red blood cell distribution width ratio trajectory patterns and in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients with cirrhosis: a retrospective cohort study based on MIMIC-IV and eICU-CRD.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Observational
- Time series analysis between platelet counts and 60-day mortality in sepsis patients with thrombocytopenia: a retrospective cohort study.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe impact of concurrent sepsis on the prognosis in patients with non-traumatic hemorrhagic brain injury (HBI) remains unclear, and the appropriate hemoglobin (HGB) level in HBI patients with sepsis has not been investigated. This study aimed to investigate the impact of sepsis in HBI and the prognosis of patients with different HGB trajectories with/without sepsis.
methodsThe association between sepsis and prognosis (including neurologic outcome and 28-day mortality) in patients with non-trauma HBI was investigated, and multivariate logistic model, propensity score matching (PSM), and inverse-probability-weighted regression adjustment (IPWRA) were used to reach a causal relationship. Group-based trajectory analysis was adopted to explore the associations between HGB trajectories and outcomes.
resultsA total of 3,040 patients were included. Compared with the HBI-without-sepsis group, the HBI-with-sepsis group had higher 28-day mortality and worse neurological outcomes. After adjusting for confounders, the association between sepsis and mortality remains significant in multivariate logistic model (OR 2.31, 95%CI 1.77-3.01), PSM analysis (212/942 vs. 130/942, p < 0.001) and IPWRA model (ATE 0.073, 95%CI 0.04-0.09). Based on 72-h HGB data, four HGB-trajectories were identified. In HBI-without-sepsis cohort, OR for mortality decreased from HGB-traj2 (OR: 0.56, 95% CI 0.33-0.96) to HGB-traj4 (0.26, 95% CI 0.11-0.59), referred to HGB-traj1. But this decreasing trend became non-significant in HBI-with-sepsis cohort. Sensitivity analyses showed similar results.
conclusionIn HBI, concurrent sepsis was associated with higher mortality rate. Furthermore, there was an inverse gradient relationship between HGB level and mortality in HBI patients without sepsis, while this association became non-significant in those with sepsis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.