ArticleEnvironmental microbiome2025
Alternative stable states of microbiome structure and soil ecosystem functions.
Article in Environmental microbiome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stochastic Forces in Microbial Community Assembly: Founding Community Size Governs Divergent Ecological Trajectories.Ecology letters · 2026Article
- Microbiome assembly statistics toward ecosystem-scale insights, forecasting, and management.The ISME journal · 2026Review
- Translating priority effects and niche engineering into rational microbiome therapeutics across the gut-lung axis.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Harnessing plant microbiomes to enhance crop resilience and restore war-affected soils in Ukraine.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Topological vulnerability explains fungal and bacterial stability differences in restoration of alpine grasslands.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Energy landscape analysis based on the Ising model: Tutorial review.PLOS complex systems · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTheory predicts that biological communities can have multiple stable states in terms of their species/taxonomic compositions. The presence of such alternative stable states has been examined in classic ecological studies on the communities of macro-organisms (e.g., distinction between forest and savanna vegetation types). Nonetheless, it remains an essential challenge to extend the target of the discussion on multistability from macro-organismal systems to highly species-rich microbial systems. Identifying alternative stable states of taxonomically diverse microbial communities is a crucial step for predicting and controlling microbiome processes in light of classic ecological studies on community stability.
resultsBy targeting soil microbiomes, we inferred the stability landscapes of community structure based on a mathematical framework of statistical physics. We compiled a dataset involving 11 archaeal, 332 bacterial, and 240 fungal families detected from > 1,500 agroecosystem soil samples and applied the energy landscape analysis to estimate the stability/instability of observed taxonomic compositions. The statistical analysis suggested that both prokaryotic and fungal community structure could be classified into several stable states. We also found that the inferred alternative stable states differed greatly in their associations with crop disease prevalence in agroecosystems. We further inferred "tipping points", through which transitions between alternative stable states could occur.
conclusionOur results suggest that the structure of complex soil microbiomes can be categorized into alternative stable states, which potentially differ in ecosystem-level functioning. Such insights into the relationship between structure, stability, and functions of ecological communities will provide a basis for ecosystem restoration and the sustainable management of agroecosystems.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.