Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40050981›Full record

ArticleBMC proceedings2025

Harnessing the power of artificial intelligence for disease-surveillance purposes.

Barbara Tornimbene, Zoila Beatriz Leiva Rioja, John Brownstein, Adam Dunn, Sylvain Faye, Jude Kong, Nada Malou, Clara Nordon, Benjamin Rader, Oliver Morgan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC proceedings, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Barbara TornimbeneWorld Health Organization Hub for Pandemic and Epidemic Intelligence, Berlin, Germany. tornimbeneb@who.int.
Zoila Beatriz Leiva RiojaCPC Analytics, Berlin, Germany.
John BrownsteinBoston Children'S Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Adam DunnUniversity of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Sylvain FayeGlobal South AI for Pandemic & Epidemic Preparedness & Response Network (Ai4pep), Toronto, Canada.
Jude KongGlobal South AI for Pandemic & Epidemic Preparedness & Response Network (Ai4pep), Toronto, Canada.
Nada MalouMedecins Sans Frontières (MSF), Paris, France.
Clara NordonMedecins Sans Frontières (MSF), Paris, France.
Benjamin RaderBoston Children'S Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Oliver MorganWorld Health Organization Hub for Pandemic and Epidemic Intelligence, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the development of AI-driven tools to improve public health surveillance and outbreak management. While AI programs have shown promise in disease surveillance, they also present issues such as data privacy, prejudice, and human-AI interactions. This sixth session of the of the WHO Pandemic and Epidemic Intelligence Innovation Forum examines the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in public health by collecting the experience of key global health organizations, such the Boston Children's Hospital, the Global South AI for Pandemic & Epidemic Preparedness & Response (AI4PEP) network, Medicines Sans Frontières (MSF), and the University of Sydney. AI's utility in clinical care, particularly in diagnostics, medication discovery, and data processing, has resulted in improvements that may also benefit public health surveillance. However, the use of AI in global health necessitates careful consideration of ethical issues, particularly those involving data use and algorithmic bias. As AI advances, particularly with large language models, public health officials must develop governance frameworks that stress openness, accountability, and fairness. These systems should address worldwide differences in data access and ensure that AI technologies are tailored to specific local needs. Ultimately, AI's ability to improve healthcare efficiency and equity is dependent on multidisciplinary collaboration, community involvement, and inclusive AI designs in ensuring equitable healthcare outcomes to fit the unique demands of global communities.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceData privacyInfectious diseaseMultidisciplinary collaborationPublic health surveillance

Identifiers

PMID40050981
PMCPMC11887143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.