Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40050978›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2025

Development and validation of intracranial hypertension prediction models based on radiomic features in patients with traumatic brain injury: an exploratory study based on CENTER-TBI data.

Yingchi Shan, Yajun Xue, Jun Zhu, Thijs Vande Vyvere, Dana Pisică, Andrew Maas, Shuo Zhang, Guoyi Gao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yingchi ShanDepartment of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Yajun XueDepartment of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Jun ZhuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Thijs Vande VyvereDepartment of Radiology, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.
Dana PisicăDepartment of Neurosurgery, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Andrew MaasDepartment of Neurosurgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.
Shuo Zhang *Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Guoyi Gao *Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. gao3@sina.com.

Funding

Beijing Natural Science Foundation J230008National Key R&D Program of China 2023YFC2410605National Natural Science Foundation of China 82401612
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHead computed tomography (CT) is a routinely performed examination to assess the intracranial condition of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI), and radiological findings can help to indicate the presence of intracranial hypertension. At present, the prediction of intracranial hypertension is mainly based on manual discrimination of imaging characteristics. The aim of our study was to establish a model to predict intracranial hypertension via fully automatic CT image segmentation, rigorous radiomic feature extraction and reliable model development and validation.

methodsPatients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) who underwent intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring were included in our study. For the development cohort, we extracted data from the CENTER-TBI database and randomly divided the data into a training group and a test group. For the validation cohort, we extracted data from patients admitted to the Shanghai General Hospital. Patients whose initial recorded ICP value was greater than or equal to 20 mmHg were defined as having intracranial hypertension. Radiological features, including imaging characteristics and three categories of radiomic features, were extracted from the head CT. Feature selection was performed for all radiological findings. A morphological model was built on the basis of selected imaging characteristics. First-order, second-order and third-order models were built on the basis of selected radiomic features. A comprehensive model was built on the basis of all selected radiological findings. The performances of these five models were assessed by four classifiers, including logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), multilayer perceptron (MLP), and extreme gradient boosting (XGB), from which the best classifier was selected. After the process of model training and external validation, we ultimately used the optimal classifier to generate a prediction model with greater predictive power and stability.

resultsFive models were built, including a morphological model, first-order model, second-order model, third-order model and comprehensive model. The optimal classifier was the logistic regression (LR) classifier, with which the morphological, first-order, second-order, third-order and comprehensive models had AUCs of 0.75, 0.77, 0.76, 0.86, and 0.83 and F1 scores of 0.54, 0.73, 0.63, 0.72, and 0.75, respectively, in the external validation group.

conclusionsWe successfully established a model for predicting intracranial hypertension on the basis of radiomic features. This model may serve as an approach for intracranial hypertension prediction in TBI patients.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticIntracranial HypertensionAdultAgedChinaCohort StudiesFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsIntracranial PressureMaleMiddle AgedRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesROC CurveTomography, X-Ray ComputedIntracranial hypertensionPredictionRadiomic featuresTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID40050978
PMCPMC11887306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.