ReviewJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025
Anatomical variability, morphofunctional characteristics, and clinical relevance of accessory ossicles of the back: implications for spinal pathophysiology and differential diagnosis.
Review in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A review and commentary on congenital anomalies of the craniocervical junction.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
- The mutational burden in os odontoideum patients.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2026Article
- Article
- Anterior cervical decompression improves medial plantar pressure in OPLL with gait disturbance: a 24-month retrospective cohort study.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Prevalence, diagnosis, and clinical significance of lumbosacral transitional vertebrae: A systematic review and narrative analysis.Brain & spine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study explored the anatomical variations and clinical implications of accessory ossicles in the spine, which are often identified incidentally but can significantly impact the differential diagnosis of spinal disorders.
methodsA comprehensive review of the literature from MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar up to April 2024 was conducted. Statistical analyses emphasized distinct patterns in prevalence, location, and correlation with symptoms, reinforcing the importance of accurate identification and appropriate patient management.
resultsLimbus Vertebra (LV) was observed in 2.5% of the cases, predominantly in the lumbar spine (70%). Ossicles of the nuchal ligament were identified in approximately 5.6% of cases, with a higher prevalence in males than in females.Correlation analysis indicated a weak positive correlation between LV and symptom severity (r = 0.25, p = 0.05) and a strong positive correlation between the ossicles of the nuchal ligament and male predominance (r = 0.75, p < 0.01). Additional accessory ossicles, including Oppenheimer's ossicles, accessory ossicles of the atlas, persistent ossiculum terminale, and os odontoideum, exhibited lower prevalence rates (< 2%), emphasizing their infrequency.
conclusionsAccessory ossicles of the spine exhibit varied prevalence and clinical significance, with some presenting minor associations with symptoms and others linked to specific syndromes or spinal disorders. The prevalence of different ossicles shows notable heterogeneity, highlighting the need for careful differential diagnosis to prevent the misinterpretation of fractures or other spinal pathologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.