Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40050950›Full record

Trial reportAdvances in rheumatology (London, England)2025

Efficacy of two doses of intra-articular ozone therapy for pain and functional mobility in knee osteoarthritis: a double-blind randomized trial.

Zahra Arjmanddoust, Ahmad Nazari, Azar Moezy

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Advances in rheumatology (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06088706 (Evaluation of the Effect of Different Doses of Ozone Therapy on Pain and Function of Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis Referred to the Sports Medicine Clinic of Hazrat Rasool Akram Hospital), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06088706 nacompletednot on this map

Evaluation of the Effect of Different Doses of Ozone Therapy on Pain and Function of Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis Referred to the Sports Medicine Clinic of Hazrat Rasool Akram Hospital

TypeinterventionalSponsorAhmad NazariRan2023 to 2024Enrolled60ConditionsOsteo Arthritis KneeArmsIntra-articular injection of ozone
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zahra ArjmanddoustDepartment of Sports and Exercise Medicine, School of Medicine, Hazrate-e Rasool General Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ahmad NazariDepartment of Sports and Exercise Medicine, School of Medicine, Hazrate-e Rasool General Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. nazari.a@iums.ac.ir.ORCID 0000-0001-7301-6618
Azar MoezyDepartment of Sports and Exercise Medicine, School of Medicine, Hazrate-e Rasool General Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThis double-blind, trial sought to assess the effectiveness of intra-articular ozone therapy at concentrations of 20 µg/mL and 40 µg/mL in managing pain and enhancing functional mobility in patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA).

methodThis parallel, three-arm randomized controlled trial, conducted between 2022 and 2023, included 59 knee osteoarthritis (KOA) patients randomly allocated to one of three groups: the first group received 40 µg/mL ozone therapy, the second group received 20 µg/mL ozone therapy, and the control group received oxygen. Functional mobility was assessed through the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), knee flexion range of motion (FROM), the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, and the six-minute walk test (6MWT). Pain intensity was measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the pain subscale of the WOMAC. Intra-articular injections were administered weekly for four consecutive weeks, with assessments conducted pre-treatment, and at two weeks, one month, and two months post-intervention. One-way ANOVA was employed for normally distributed quantitative data, while the Kruskal-Wallis test was utilized for non-normally distributed data. Qualitative variables were analyzed using the Chi-squared or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate.

resultsThe groups receiving intra-articular ozone therapy exhibited notable reductions in mean VAS scores and improvement in functional mobility variables when compared to the control group (p < 0.05). However, post-hoc analysis indicated no statistically significant differences between the 40 µg/mL and 20 µg/mL ozone therapy groups regarding these parameters (VAS, FROM, TUG, 6MWT, or WOMAC scores) (p > 0.05).

conclusionBoth 20 µg/mL and 40 µg/mL doses of intra-articular ozone therapy prove to be effective in reducing pain and enhancing functional mobility in patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Nevertheless, there was no significant difference in the efficacy between the two ozone concentrations.

trial registrationThe trial is registered on us ClinicalTrials.gov in 2024-05-01 with the following ID code NCT06088706.

Indexed as

Osteoarthritis, KneeOzonePain ManagementAgedDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansInjections, Intra-ArticularMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementRange of Motion, ArticularTreatment OutcomeOzoneDouble-blind randomized controlled trialFunctional mobilityIntra-articular ozone therapyKnee osteoarthritisPain

Identifiers

PMID40050950
PMCPMC13488726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.