ReviewJournal of nanobiotechnology2025
An exploration of the ocular mysteries linking nanoparticles to the patho-therapeutic effects against keratitis.
Review in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bridging Gaps in Fungal Keratitis Management: Novel Diagnostics, Drug Delivery Systems, and Gene Therapies.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2026Review
- Advances in the engineering of living probiotics for cancer immunotherapy.Theranostics · 2026Review
- Nanozymes in Therapeutic Prospects and Challenges for Autoimmune Diseases.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Nanotechnology-Based Treatment for Ophthalmic Diseases.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- In Situ Forming Poloxamer-Based Thermo-Sensitive Hydrogels for Ocular Application: A Focus on the Derivatives 407 and 188.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Invasomes and Nanostructured Lipid Carriers for Targeted Delivery of Ceftazidime Combined with N-Acetylcysteine: A Novel Approach to TreatPharmaceutics · 2025Article
- MoSInternational journal of nanomedicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microbial keratitis, a sight-threatening corneal infection, remains a significant global health concern. Conventional therapies using antimicrobial agents often suffers from limitations such as poor drug penetration, side effects, and occurrence of drug resistance, with poor prognosis. Novel treatment techniques, with their unique properties and targeted delivery capabilities, offers a promising solution to overcome these challenges. This review delves into timely update of the state-of-the-art advance therapeutics for keratitis treatment. The diverse microbial origins of keratitis, including viral, bacterial, and fungal infections, exploring their complex pathogenic mechanisms, followed by the drug resistance mechanisms in keratitis pathogens are reviewed briefly. Importantly, the emerging therapeutic techniques for keratitis treatment including piezodynamic therapy, photothermal therapy, photodynamic therapy, nanoenzyme therapy, and metal ion therapy are summarized in this review showcasing their potential to overcome the limitations of traditional treatments. The challenges and future directions for advance therapies and nanotechnology-based approaches are discussed, focusing on safety, targeting strategies, drug resistance, and combination therapies. This review aims to inspire researchers to revolutionize and accelerate the development of functional materials using different therapies for keratitis treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.