ReviewMolecular cancer2025
Contract to kill: GNAS mutation.
Review in Molecular cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- GNAS drives gastric cancer progression via pyrimidine metabolic reprogramming and immune-microenvironment remodeling.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2026Article
- Unraveling the link between GNAS R201 mutation and colorectal cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- ARF: the most misunderstood GTPase I ever knew - why study ARF GAPs.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The mutation in Gsα-coding GNAS exons, popular as gsp oncogene, is the most frequent mutation across all heterotrimeric G proteins involved in oncogenesis. GNAS R201, the most frequently mutated, followed by Q227, are found predominantly across various neoplasms and cancers such as IPMN, pituitary, thyroid, appendiceal, colorectal, etc. This review emphasizes the pivotal significance of the gsp oncogene and its ramifications underpinning the sustained addiction to GNAS mutation. Recent studies delineating the mechanistic intricacies that provide solid evidence of the profound impact of oncogenic GNAS on tumor formation, progression, and maintenance are highlighted. We have leveraged the discoveries of Gsα as an ideal neoantigen candidate for vaccine therapy, allele-specific inhibitors, and cyclic peptide-based small molecular inhibitors for G proteins and explored the therapeutic potential to target oncogenic GNAS directly. Alternative therapeutic modalities and patient-centric studies to mitigate the impact of GNAS mutations are also discussed. The exposition of novel studies and strategies designed to address the potential challenges inherent in these approaches of targeting the activating mutations of GNAS, along with probable avenues for further investigation, are highlighted. This review aims to reverberate the current understanding of the oncogenic potential of GNAS, the genomic and biological landscape of GNAS-driven neoplasms and cancers, and potential therapeutic strategies against them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.