Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40050868›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Application of the random forest algorithm to predict skilled birth attendance and identify determinants among reproductive-age women in 27 Sub-Saharan African countries; machine learning analysis.

Eliyas Addisu Taye, Eden Yitbarek Woubet, Gabrela Yimer Hailie, Fetlework Gubena Arage, Tigabu Eskeziya Zerihun, Adem Tsegaw Zegeye, Tarekegn Cheklie Zeleke, Abel Temeche Kassaw

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Eliyas Addisu TayeDepartment of Health Informatics, Institute of Public Health, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia. eliyasaddisu12@gmail.com.
Eden Yitbarek WoubetDepartment of Reproductive Health, Institute of Public Health, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Gabrela Yimer HailieDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety, Institute of Public Health, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Fetlework Gubena ArageDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Tigabu Eskeziya ZerihunDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Pharmacy Education and Clinical Services Directorate, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia.
Adem Tsegaw ZegeyeDepartment of Health Informatics, Institute of Public Health, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Tarekegn Cheklie ZelekeDepartment of Optometry, School of Medicine, Tertiary Eye Care and Training Center, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Abel Temeche KassawDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Pharmacy Education and Clinical Services Directorate, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMaternal mortality refers to a mother's death owing to complications arising from childbirth or pregnancy. This issue is a forefront public health challenge around the globe which is pronounced in low- and middle-income countries, particularly in the sub-Saharan African regions where the burdens remain significantly high. Moreover, this problem is further complicated in developing countries due to limited access to antenatal care and the shortage of skilled birth attendants. So far, considerable improvements in the health status of many populations have been reported in developing countries. Nonetheless, the MDGs to reduce maternal and newborn mortality unmet in many SSA nations. Leveraging machine learning approaches allows us to better understand these constraints and predict skilled birth attendance among reproductive age women, providing actionable insights for policy and intervention.

objectiveThis study aimed to predict skill birth attendance and identify its determinants among reproductive age women in 27 SSA countries using machine learning algorithm.

methodsUsing data from the Demographic and Health Surveys (2016-2024) across 27 SSA countries, we analyzed responses from 198,707 reproductive age women. The Random Forest classifier, complemented by SHAP for feature interpretability, was employed for prediction and analysis. Data preprocessing included K-nearest neighbor imputation for missing values, SMOTE for handling class imbalance, and Recursive Feature Elimination for feature selection. Model performance was evaluated using metrics such as accuracy, recall, F1 score, and AUC-ROC.

resultsThe Random Forest model demonstrated robust performance, achieving an AUC-ROC of 92%, recall of 96%, accuracy of 92%, precision of 93 and F1 score of 93%. The SHAP analysis identifies key predictors of skilled birth attendance, including facility delivery, maternal education, higher wealth index, urban residence, reduced distance to healthcare facilities, media exposure, and internet use. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The findings highlight the potential of machine learning to identify critical predictors of skilled birth attendance to inform targeted interventions. Addressing socioeconomic and educational disparities, enhancing healthcare access, and implementing tailored cessation programs are crucial to enhance skilled birth attendance in this vulnerable population.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMachine LearningMidwiferyAdolescentAdultAfrica South of the SaharaFemaleHumansMaternal MortalityPregnancyRandom ForestYoung AdultMachine learningPredictionSHAPSkilled birth attendanceSub-Saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID40050868
PMCPMC11887244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.