Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40050851›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Engaging, recruiting, and retaining pregnant people from marginalized communities in environmental health cohort studies: a scoping review.

Ghazal S Fazli, Erica Phipps, Eric Crighton, Anglena Sarwar, Jillian Ashley-Martin

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ghazal S FazliDepartment of Geography, Geomatics, and the Environment, University of Toronto Mississauga, Mississauga, ON, Canada.
Erica PhippsDepartment of Geography, Environment and Geomatics, Prenatal Environmental Health Education (PEHE) Collaboration, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Eric CrightonDepartment of Geography, Environment and Geomatics, Prenatal Environmental Health Education (PEHE) Collaboration, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Anglena SarwarDepartment of Geography, Environment and Geomatics, Prenatal Environmental Health Education (PEHE) Collaboration, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Jillian Ashley-MartinEnvironmental Health Science and Research Bureau, Health Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada. jillian.ashley-martin@hc-sc.gc.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo identify barriers to and strategies for improving the representation of pregnant people from marginalized communities in pregnancy cohort studies that measure environmental chemicals.

methodsGuided by the Arksey O'Malley and Levac Frameworks, we conducted a scoping review of peer-reviewed literature published between 2000 and 2022. Included studies discussed barriers and/or strategies related to engaging, recruiting, and retaining pregnant participants or participants of reproductive age from marginalized communities into environmental health research.

resultsTwenty-nine peer-reviewed articles were included in the review. Overall, 31% (9/29) of the studies reported on engagement, recruitment, and retention of participants from racialized communities, 10% (3/29) reported on involvement of participants identifying as Indigenous, and 10% (3/29) of studies reported on participants living in households or areas of low socioeconomic status. We identified four key barriers: participant burden, social inequities, lack of trust, and lack of cultural relevance. We reported identified strategies to mitigate these barriers.

conclusionAlthough there is limited coverage in the literature on strategies to effectively engage people from marginalized communities in environmental health pregnancy cohort studies, our findings suggest that applying a health equity and social justice lens to research may help address barriers that exist at the individual, interpersonal, community, institutional, and policy levels. Findings from this review may have important implications for planning future pregnancy cohort studies and ensuring that communities who are disproportionately affected by environmental chemical exposures may be better represented in research and considered in policy decisions.

Indexed as

Environmental HealthPatient SelectionPregnant PeopleSocial MarginalizationCohort StudiesFemaleHumansPregnancyCohortEngagementEnvironmental chemicalsMarginalizedPregnancyRecruitmentRetention

Identifiers

PMID40050851
PMCPMC11887406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.