ReviewMicrobial cell factories2025
Metabolic engineering of Lactobacilli spp. for disease treatment.
Review in Microbial cell factories, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Polysaccharide-Based Encapsulation of Microbes for Enhanced Microbial Therapy.Polymer science & technology (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
- Prospects and challenges in using engineered lactic acid bacteria in aquaculture applications.Engineering microbiology · 2026Review
- Lactobacilli biology, applications and host interactions.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2026Review
- OvercomingFrontiers in antibiotics · 2026Review
- Role of Probiotics in Enhancing Immune Function and Improving the Effectiveness of Treatments for Pancreatic Cancer.Microorganisms · 2025Review
- Synthetic microbial consortia based on quorum-sensing for disease therapy.Bioresources and bioprocessing · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA variety of probiotics have been utilized as chassis strains and engineered to develop the synthetic probiotics for disease treatment. Among these probiotics, Lactobacilli, which are generally viewed as safe and capable of colonizing the gastrointestinal tract effectively, are widely used. We review recent advancements in the engineering of Lactobacilli for disease treatment. Specifically, the Lactobacilli that are used for the construction of synthetic probiotics, the application of these engineered strains for diseases treatment, and the therapeutic outcomes of these engineered microbes are summarized in this review. Moreover, the applications of these engineered strains for disease treatment are categorized based on their engineering strategies. Of note, we compare the advantages and disadvantages of various engineering strategies and offer insights for the future development of genetically modified Lactobacillus strains with stable and safe properties. SHORT
conclusionOur study comprehensively reviews researches on engineering diverse Lactobacillus strains for disease treatment, categorized by their engineering strategies, and emphasizes the importance of developing synthetic probiotics with stable and safe characteristics to enhance their therapeutic applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.