Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40050839›Full record

ArticleBMC urology2025

Complete urethral rupture accompanying penile fracture: a case report.

Dursun Baba, Necati Ekici, Arda Taşkın Taşkıran, Yusuf Şenoğlu, Ekrem Başaran, Ahmet Yıldırım Balik

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in BMC urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dursun BabaDepartment of Urology, Duzce University School of Medicine, Duzce, 81100, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4779-6777
Necati EkiciDepartment of Urology, Duzce University School of Medicine, Duzce, 81100, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-5210-5720
Arda Taşkın TaşkıranDepartment of Urology, Duzce University School of Medicine, Duzce, 81100, Turkey. drardataskiran@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4556-3475
Yusuf ŞenoğluDepartment of Urology, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3072-9252
Ekrem BaşaranDepartment of Urology, Duzce University School of Medicine, Duzce, 81100, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8319-512X
Ahmet Yıldırım BalikDepartment of Urology, Duzce University School of Medicine, Duzce, 81100, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8051-5802

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and importancePenile fracture is a rare urological emergency. It occurs due to the penis being subjected to force during intercourse or other causes. Treatment is usually surgical. Urethral injury accompanies 10-20% of cases. In this case, a complete urethral rupture accompanying a penile fracture is aimed to be presented. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 45-year-old male patient presented to the emergency department with complaints of a snapping sound, pain, and sudden loss of erection during sexual intercourse. After a while, bleeding from the external meatus and inability to urinate were added to his complaints. Physical examination showed typical signs of penile fracture along with urethrorrhagia. The penile doppler ultrasound result was reported to be consistent with a penile fracture and uretral injury. Approximately one hour after presenting to the emergency department, the patient underwent surgery. Considering the possibility of urethral rupture, a urethroscopy was performed before fracture repair, revealing a urethral defect approximately 8 cm proximal to the external meatus. Surgical repair found a near-complete bilateral rupture of the corpus cavernosum and a complete urethral rupture. The urethral rupture and fracture area were repaired according to surgical procedure standards. No additional complaints or new pathologies were observed in the early postoperative follow-up. The patient was discharged with a catheter on postoperative day 3. On the 14th postoperative day, the patient's catheter was removed. At the 3-month follow-up, the patient had no urinary complaints, and the uroflowmetry test showed a Qmax of 35. No pathology was detected in the urethrography performed. At the one-year follow-up, the patient's International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) score was 26, indicating no additional complaints. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Complete urethral rupture and bilateral corpus cavernosum rupture are rare urological emergencies, typically resulting from trauma applied to an erect penis. A physical examination, ultrasonography, and, when necessary, imaging techniques such as cystoscopy are the diagnostic modalities employed in such cases. Early surgical treatment has been shown to improve functional outcomes and reduce long-term complications.

conclusionEarly surgical intervention in the treatment of penile fractures not only preserves sexual function but also significantly reduces long-term complications. Urethral rupture should always be considered in fractures accompanied by urethrorrhagia and hematuria.

Indexed as

PenisUrethraHumansMaleMiddle AgedRuptureCase reportPenile fractureUrethral bleedingUrethral injury

Identifiers

PMID40050839
PMCPMC11887391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.