Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40050836›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2025

Effects of the Community Paramedicine at Clinic (CP@clinic) program on the health behaviours of older adults residing in social housing: secondary outcomes of a cluster-randomized trial.

Jasdeep Brar, Leena AlShenaiber, Jasmine Dzerounian, Melissa Pirrie, Ricardo Angeles, Francine Marzanek, Gina Agarwal

Registry-linked trialAbstract readPragmatic Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02152891 (A Community Paramedicine Initiative for Older Adults Living in Subsidized Housing), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02152891 nacompletednot on this map

A Community Paramedicine Initiative for Older Adults Living in Subsidized Housing (CHAP-EMS/Renamed to CP@Clinic)

TypeinterventionalSponsorMcMaster UniversityRan2015 to 2018Enrolled1,200ConditionsCardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes MellitusArmsCHAP-EMS/CP@clinic
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jasdeep BrarDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Leena AlShenaiberDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Jasmine DzerounianDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Melissa PirrieDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Ricardo AngelesDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Francine MarzanekDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Gina AgarwalDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. gina.agarwal@gmail.com.

Funding

CIHR 133563
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunity-dwelling, low-income older adults who reside in social housing are a vulnerable population with high rates of poor health behaviours that contribute to chronic health conditions and adverse health outcomes. This study investigates the impact of the Community Paramedicine at Clinic (CP@clinic), a chronic disease prevention, management, and health promotion program, on the health behaviours of this population.

methodsAn open-label, pragmatic cluster-randomized controlled trial with parallel intervention and control groups was conducted for one-year within 30 social housing buildings in Ontario, Canada. Eligible buildings were required to have a postal code not shared with other addresses, a majority of tenants aged 55 years or older, at least 50 units, and a similar building available for matching. Buildings were paired and randomized to either intervention (CP@clinic program) or control (usual care) groups. The CP@clinic program was conducted in the common spaces of the intervention buildings and consisted of weekly drop-in sessions facilitated by trained community paramedics. Older adults met one-on-one with community paramedics who conducted evidence-based risk assessments, made referrals to community and healthcare resources, provided health education, and reported health assessment results back to family physicians. Pre- and post-intervention surveys were conducted. Descriptive statistics were used to describe demographic characteristics and health behaviours. Mann-Whitney U tests were conducted to compare individual-level change in health behaviours between intervention and control groups.

resultsFrom the 15 intervention and 15 control buildings, 656 participants completed either the pre- and/or post-intervention survey; the mean age was 72.1 (SD 8.7) years, 75.6% were female, 91.6% were not married, 89% were white, 68.4% obtained a high school education or less, and 90% lived alone. After the intervention, the individual-level consumption of weekly fruit and vegetables and time spent watching TV improved significantly (p < 0.05) for the intervention group compared to the control group (z-scores = -2.467 and -2.194, respectively). The change in consumption of carbohydrate/grains increased significantly for the intervention group compared to the control group (z-score -2.023, p < 0.05).

conclusionThe CP@clinic program is an innovative wellness program that had a significant impact in changing health behaviours, especially in weekly fruit and vegetable consumption, among a vulnerable older adult population.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02152891, registered June 6, 2014.

Indexed as

Community Health ServicesHealth BehaviorHealth PromotionPublic HousingAgedAged, 80 and overChronic DiseaseCluster AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOntarioParamedicineProgram EvaluationCommunity-based interventionCommunity paramedicineFruit and vegetable consumptionHealth behavioursHealth promotionOlder adultsSocial housing

Identifiers

PMID40050836
PMCPMC11883937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.