ArticleBMC public health2025
Assessment of the awareness of rabies, rabies prophylaxis guidelines and rabies practice among physicians in Sudan: a national cross-sectional study, 2024.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Smart assistive technologies for neurodisorders: A review on AI, IoT, and wearable systems for enhanced patient care.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Review
- Public knowledge, awareness, and practices regarding rabies in Palestine: a cross-sectional survey, 2025.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRabies is a preventable viral zoonotic disease with a near 100% case fatality rate once clinical symptoms appear. In Sudan, rabies remains a significant public health concern, exacerbated by limited resources and the ongoing armed conflict. Physicians play a critical role in rabies prevention and management, yet their knowledge and adherence to updated clinical guidelines remain poorly understood. This study assesses physicians' knowledge, and awareness of rabies disease, adherence to updated rabies prophylaxis guidelines, and clinical practices in Sudan.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted in June 2024, targeting licensed physicians actively practicing in Sudan. Data were collected using a self-administered, structured questionnaire distributed via social media platforms. The questionnaire evaluated demographic characteristics, general rabies knowledge, familiarity with updated guidelines, and clinical practices. Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 28, with significance set at p < 0.05.
resultsA total of 468 physicians participated, with (52%) demonstrating adequate general rabies knowledge and only (7.1%) showing good knowledge of updated guidelines. Awareness of critical aspects, such as the intradermal route of vaccine administration (20.1%) and the appropriate use of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) (25.5%), was limited. Clinical practice scores indicated moderate knowledge, with 56.2% demonstrating good practice in rabies management. Correlation analysis revealed a positive association between knowledge of updated guidelines and clinical practice (r = 0.230, p < 0.001). No significant associations were found between knowledge levels and demographic or professional characteristics.
conclusionsThe study reveals significant gaps in rabies knowledge, updated rabies prophylaxis guidelines awareness, and clinical practices among Sudanese physicians, highlighting the need for targeted training and resource allocation. Strengthening healthcare systems, particularly in conflict-affected regions, and promoting adherence to WHO rabies guidelines are critical to improving rabies prevention and management in Sudan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.