Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40050820›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025

Diagnosis extraction from unstructured Dutch echocardiogram reports using span- and document-level characteristic classification.

Bauke Arends, Melle Vessies, Dirk van Osch, Arco Teske, Pim van der Harst, René van Es, Bram van Es

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bauke ArendsDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. b.k.o.arends-4@umcutrecht.nl.
Melle VessiesDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Dirk van OschDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Arco TeskeDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Pim van der HarstDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
René van EsDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Bram van EsCentral Diagnostic Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

European Union's Horizon Europe research and innovation programme 101057849
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical machine learning research and artificial intelligence driven clinical decision support models rely on clinically accurate labels. Manually extracting these labels with the help of clinical specialists is often time-consuming and expensive. This study tests the feasibility of automatic span- and document-level diagnosis extraction from unstructured Dutch echocardiogram reports.

methodsWe included 115,692 unstructured echocardiogram reports from the University Medical Center Utrecht, a large university hospital in the Netherlands. A randomly selected subset was manually annotated for the occurrence and severity of eleven commonly described cardiac characteristics. We developed and tested several automatic labelling techniques at both span and document levels, using weighted and macro F1-score, precision, and recall for performance evaluation. We compared the performance of span labelling against document labelling methods, which included both direct document classifiers and indirect document classifiers that rely on span classification results.

resultsThe SpanCategorizer and MedRoBERTa.nl models outperformed all other span and document classifiers, respectively. The weighted F1-score varied between characteristics, ranging from 0.60 to 0.93 in SpanCategorizer and 0.96 to 0.98 in MedRoBERTa.nl. Direct document classification was superior to indirect document classification using span classifiers. SetFit achieved competitive document classification performance using only 10% of the training data. Utilizing a reduced label set yielded near-perfect document classification results.

conclusionWe recommend using our published SpanCategorizer and MedRoBERTa.nl models for span- and document-level diagnosis extraction from Dutch echocardiography reports. For settings with limited training data, SetFit may be a promising alternative for document classification. Future research should be aimed at training a RoBERTa based span classifier and applying English based models on translated echocardiogram reports.

Indexed as

EchocardiographyMachine LearningNatural Language ProcessingHumansNetherlandsClinical natural language processingDocument classificationEchocardiogramEntity classificationSpan classification

Identifiers

PMID40050820
PMCPMC11887187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.