ArticleBMC psychiatry2025
Association between fragmented care and incident mood disorder in elderly patients with colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study in South Korea.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study investigated the relationship between fragmented care (patient care provided at multiple hospitals) and incident mood disorders in elderly colorectal cancer patients. Fragmented care was defined as a change in the medical institution providing first cancer treatment within 180 days of cancer diagnosis. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of fragmented care on the incidence of mood disorder after cancer diagnosis in elderly colorectal cancer patients.
methodsThis study used NHIS Senior cohort data between 2002 and 2019 in South Korea. The participants included individuals aged 60 to 80 years who were diagnosed with colorectal cancer between 2008 and 2014. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of mood disorders within five years after cancer diagnosis. The independent variable was fragmented care. Regression analysis was conducted using the Cox proportional hazard model, and a sensitivity analysis was performed to enhance the robustness of the study findings.
resultsOf the total 3,726 participants, 878 (23.6%) were diagnosed with mood disorders, and 328 (8.8%) experienced fragmented care. The mood disorder incidence rate per 100,000 person-days was higher among those who experienced fragmented care (18.9 cases) compared to those who did not (14.6 cases). Participants who received fragmented care had a significantly higher risk of incident mood disorders (hazard ratio 1.39, 95% confidence interval 1.10-1.77). The results of the sensitivity analysis, which extended the fragmented care observation period, remained consistent with the original findings. Additionally, subgroup analysis revealed that the effect of fragmented care on incident mood disorders was significantly associated with female sex, chronic diseases, lower economic status, and type of colon cancer (C18).
conclusionsFragmented care increased the risk of incident mood disorders within the first five years of diagnosis in elderly patients with colorectal cancer. The findings highlight the potentially important role of a cohesive health system in managing the mental health of patients with colorectal cancer, which is important considering that depression is relatively commonly found in these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.