Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40050805›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025

Construction and validation of a predictive model for sleep disorders among pregnant women.

Deguang Yang, Ye Li, Jing Jia, Hongyu Li, Rui Wang, Jiashu Zhu, Can Liu, Shuqin Ma, Suzhen Guan

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Deguang Yang *School of Public Health, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, 750004, China.
Ye Li *School of Public Health, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, 750004, China.
Jing JiaGeneral Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, 750004, China.
Hongyu LiSchool of Public Health, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, 750004, China.
Rui WangSchool of Public Health, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, 750004, China.
Jiashu ZhuSchool of Public Health, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, 750004, China.
Can LiuSchool of Public Health, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, 750004, China.
Shuqin MaGeneral Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, 750004, China.
Suzhen GuanSchool of Public Health, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, 750004, China. guansz_nx2017@sina.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSleep disorders are among the most common major problems during pregnancy. Most studies on sleep disorders of pregnant women are closely related to adverse birth outcomes. In this study, our aim was to develop and validate a predictive model for the risk of sleep disorders in pregnant women.

methodsA total of 2,467 healthy pregnant women were enrolled and randomly partitioned into a training set and a validation set at a ratio of 7:3. During the variable selection stage, the Pearson's chi-square test was employed to identify variables with a p-value below 0.05, which were then designated as candidate variables for subsequent logistic regression analysis. Concurrently, the LASSO regression technique was utilized to sift through and isolate the most valuable variables. Ultimately, we developed binary Logistic regression models predicated on the Pearson's chi-square test (Model 1) and the LASSO regression (Model 2). The performance of the nomograms was evaluated using the Bootstrap resampling procedure, the sensitivity and specificity of the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC), the area under the ROC curve (AUC), and decision curve analysis (DCA).

resultsA total of 439 (25.4%) pregnant women in the training set and 208 (28.1%) in the validation set exhibited sleep disorder, respectively. The prediction models shared 6 risk factors (age, anxiety, depression, family functions, degree of pregnancy reaction, pre-pregnancy physical condition). In the Model 1, the sensitivity was 69.4%, and specificity was 59.6%. When pregnancy weeks, residence, only child were included in Model 2, the sensitivity was 82.4% and specificity was 54.8%. In the validation set, the areas under the curve of the Model 1 and Model 2 were 0.678 (0.635, 0.720), and 0.719 (0.678, 0.761), respectively. The risk prediction model of sleep disorders in pregnant women showed that the calibration curve is approximately distributed along the reference line. Decision curve analyses demonstrated a favorable net benefit within the range of the threshold probability in the nomograms.

conclusionModel 2 exhibited superior performance, can serve as a convenient and reliable tool for predicting the risk probability of sleep disorders in pregnant women.

Indexed as

Pregnancy ComplicationsSleep Wake DisordersAdultFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsNomogramsPregnancyPregnant PeopleRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsROC CurveYoung AdultLASSOLogistic regressionPrediction modelPregnant womenSleep disorders

Identifiers

PMID40050805
PMCPMC11887067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.