Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40050782›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2025

A novel malaria mathematical model: integrating vector and non-vector transmission pathways.

Emmanuel Akowe, Queeneth Ojoma Ahman, Benedict Celestine Agbata, Solomon Onuche Joseph, Emmanuel Olorunfemi Senewo, Abdul Yusuf Danjuma, Danjuma Jibrin Yahaya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emmanuel AkoweDepartment of Mathematics/Statistics, Confluence University of Science and Technology, Osara, Kogi State, Nigeria.
Queeneth Ojoma AhmanDepartment of Mathematics/Statistics, Confluence University of Science and Technology, Osara, Kogi State, Nigeria. ahmanqo@custech.edu.ng.
Benedict Celestine AgbataDepartment of Mathematics/Statistics, Confluence University of Science and Technology, Osara, Kogi State, Nigeria.
Solomon Onuche JosephDepartment of Mathematics/Statistics, Confluence University of Science and Technology, Osara, Kogi State, Nigeria.
Emmanuel Olorunfemi SenewoDepartment of Mathematics/Statistics, Confluence University of Science and Technology, Osara, Kogi State, Nigeria.
Abdul Yusuf DanjumaDepartment of Actuarial Science, Confluence University of Science and Technology, Osara, Kogi State, Nigeria.
Danjuma Jibrin YahayaDepartment of Mathematics/Statistics, Confluence University of Science and Technology, Osara, Kogi State, Nigeria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMalaria remains one of the most significant global health challenges, particularly in tropical and subtropical regions. Despite ongoing control efforts, malaria transmission persists due to complex biological, environmental, and socio-economic factors. Traditional malaria models have primarily focused on vector-borne transmission, overlooking the growing importance of non-vector transmission pathways, such as blood transfusions, congenital transmission, and human-to-human transmission through healthcare settings.

methodsA novel mathematical model was developed to integrate both vector-borne and non-vector transmission routes. The model expands the traditional Susceptible-Exposed-Infectious-Recovered (SEIR) framework by incorporating compartments for vaccinated and non-vector exposed human populations, as well as dynamics for both human and mosquito populations. Numerical simulations were performed using MATLAB to evaluate the impact of vaccination, vector control, non-vector control, and treatment strategies.

resultsThe results indicate that vaccination significantly reduces susceptibility to malaria, with numerical simulations showing an approximate 43% reduction in the susceptible human population. However, vector control remains critical in limiting exposure, and non-vector transmission pathways including blood transfusions, congenital transmission, and direct human-to-human transmission pose a substantial risk even in regions with effective mosquito control. This underscores the need for integrated strategies that address both vector and non-vector transmission routes.

conclusionsCombining vaccination efforts with robust vector control, improved healthcare practices, and stringent non-vector transmission prevention measures is essential to effectively reduce malaria transmission. Sustained interventions, including improved blood screening and safe medical practices, are necessary to prevent malaria resurgence, particularly in high-transmission settings. This model provides valuable insights into malaria dynamics and offers a framework for designing more effective public health policies and strategies for malaria eradication.

Indexed as

MalariaModels, TheoreticalMosquito VectorsAnimalsComputer SimulationHumansMosquito ControlVaccinationMalaria transmission dynamicsMathematical modelingNon-vector transmissionSEIR modelVector transmission

Identifiers

PMID40050782
PMCPMC11887401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.