Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40050766›Full record

SynthesisBMC ophthalmology2025

Is there an association between retinal vein occlusion and cerebrovascular accident? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kai-Yang Chen, Hoi-Chun Chan, Chi-Ming Chan

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Does retinal vascular occlusion increase the risk of dementia? A pioneering systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Assessing mortality risk in narcolepsy: Evidence from population studies.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kai-Yang ChenSchool of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Hoi-Chun ChanSchool of Pharmacy, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Chi-Ming ChanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Cardinal Tien Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan. m212092001@tmu.edu.tw.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRetinal vein occlusion (RVO) is a significant retinal vascular disorder that has been hypothesized to increase the risk of cerebrovascular accidents (CVA). Given the shared vascular pathology between the retina and cerebral circulation, understanding the association between RVO and stroke incidence is critical for early intervention and risk management. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the risk of CVA, including ischemic and hemorrhagic subtypes, in patients with RVO.

methodsThis study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024557820). A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase was conducted from inception to February 2025. Studies assessing the incidence of CVA post-RVO in adult patients (≥ 18 years) were included. Two independent reviewers performed study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for Non-Randomized studies (ROBINS-I) was used for observational cohort studies. Meta-analysis was conducted using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA) software version 3.7, applying a fixed-effects model for low heterogeneity. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed based on RVO type (BRVO vs. CRVO) and stroke subtype (ischemic vs. hemorrhagic CVA). Publication bias was evaluated using Egger's test and funnel plots.

resultsA total of 14 studies (n = 97,812 patients) were included. The pooled event rate for CVA post-RVO was 37.5% (95% CI: 37.3%-37.8%), with no significant heterogeneity (I

conclusionThis meta-analysis provides strong evidence linking RVO to an increased risk of CVA and mortality. Given the high incidence of stroke (37.5%) and mortality post-CVA (69%), early cardiovascular risk assessment and intervention are crucial. Patients with RVO should undergo comprehensive vascular risk evaluation, including blood pressure control, lipid regulation, and anticoagulation therapy when indicated. The findings support a multidisciplinary approach involving ophthalmologists, neurologists, and cardiologists for proactive stroke prevention strategies in RVO patients. Future research should explore genetic predispositions, inflammatory markers, and AI-based predictive models to improve early risk stratification and intervention.

Indexed as

Retinal Vein OcclusionStrokeHumansIncidenceRisk FactorsCardiovascular riskCerebrovascular accidentHemorrhagic strokeIschemic strokeMeta-analysisMortalityRetinal vein occlusion

Identifiers

PMID40050766
PMCPMC11887117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.