SynthesisBMC ophthalmology2025
Is there an association between retinal vein occlusion and cerebrovascular accident? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Does retinal vascular occlusion increase the risk of dementia? A pioneering systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025Pooled it
- Is Botulinum toxin A effective in treating dry eye disease? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Eye (London, England) · 2025Pooled it
- Assessing mortality risk in narcolepsy: Evidence from population studies.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2026Review
- Retinal vein occlusion on YouTube: how reliable is public health information in the digital era?International ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Habitual Oily Fish Intake and Microvascular Integrity in Frequent Fish Consumers: A Population-Based, Cross-Sectional Pilot Study.Journal of primary care & community healthArticle
- Is a thermal pulsation system (LipiFlow) effective as a standalone treatment for meibomian gland dysfunction and dry eye? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Therapeutic advances in ophthalmologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRetinal vein occlusion (RVO) is a significant retinal vascular disorder that has been hypothesized to increase the risk of cerebrovascular accidents (CVA). Given the shared vascular pathology between the retina and cerebral circulation, understanding the association between RVO and stroke incidence is critical for early intervention and risk management. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the risk of CVA, including ischemic and hemorrhagic subtypes, in patients with RVO.
methodsThis study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024557820). A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase was conducted from inception to February 2025. Studies assessing the incidence of CVA post-RVO in adult patients (≥ 18 years) were included. Two independent reviewers performed study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for Non-Randomized studies (ROBINS-I) was used for observational cohort studies. Meta-analysis was conducted using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA) software version 3.7, applying a fixed-effects model for low heterogeneity. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed based on RVO type (BRVO vs. CRVO) and stroke subtype (ischemic vs. hemorrhagic CVA). Publication bias was evaluated using Egger's test and funnel plots.
resultsA total of 14 studies (n = 97,812 patients) were included. The pooled event rate for CVA post-RVO was 37.5% (95% CI: 37.3%-37.8%), with no significant heterogeneity (I
conclusionThis meta-analysis provides strong evidence linking RVO to an increased risk of CVA and mortality. Given the high incidence of stroke (37.5%) and mortality post-CVA (69%), early cardiovascular risk assessment and intervention are crucial. Patients with RVO should undergo comprehensive vascular risk evaluation, including blood pressure control, lipid regulation, and anticoagulation therapy when indicated. The findings support a multidisciplinary approach involving ophthalmologists, neurologists, and cardiologists for proactive stroke prevention strategies in RVO patients. Future research should explore genetic predispositions, inflammatory markers, and AI-based predictive models to improve early risk stratification and intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.