Trial reportBMC gastroenterology2025
Effect of montelukast on remission maintenance in patients with ulcerative colitis: a Randomized, double-blind controlled clinical trial.
Trial report in BMC gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundConsidering the role of leukotrienes in inflammatory pathways, and owing to the anti-leukotrienes effect of montelukast, in the present clinical trial, we aimed to assess the effect of montelukast on remission maintenance in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC).
methodsIn the present double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial, 222 volunteer UC patients on high-dose corticosteroid and montelukast were recruited. The patients received 10 mg of montelukast (98 patients) or placebo (124 patients) for 22 weeks. Simultaneously, the prednisolone dose was tapered. The patients were followed up eight more weeks post-interventions. The primary efficacy of the treatment was remaining in remission.
results194 patients completed this study. During the study, relapse occurred in 108 patients, 32 patients in the montelukast group and 76 patients in the placebo group. There were significant differences between groups regarding the relapse-free period (intervention group mean: 27.25 95% CI: 26.17-28.32 weeks and placebo group mean: 20.88; 95% CI: 19.36, 20.40 weeks, P < 0.001). At the end of the intervention period and six weeks' post-intervention, the mean partial Mayo score, and inflammatory biomarkers were significantly lower in the montelukast group compared with the placebo group. The frequency of patients with high fecal calprotectin levels was significantly higher in the placebo group compared with the montelukast Group.
conclusionThe findings indicated that compared with placebo, montelukast had a significant positive effect on remission maintenance in UC patients who were in the steroid-tapering phase of therapy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: IRCT20121212011738N3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.