Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40050732›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2025

Robust phylogenetic tree-based microbiome association test using repeatedly measured data for composition bias.

Kangjin Kim, Sungho Won

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kangjin KimDepartment of Applied Statistics, Gachon University, Seongnam, South Korea.
Sungho WonInstitute of Health and Environment, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea. won1@snu.ac.kr.

Funding

Korea National Institute of Health 2024ER210800National Research Foundation NRF-2021R1A5A1033157National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2023M3E5D3009803
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe effects of microbiota on the host phenotypes can differ substantially depending on their age. Longitudinally measured microbiome data allow for the detection of the age modification effect and are useful for the detection of microorganisms related to the progression of disease whose identification change over time. Moreover, longitudinal analysis facilitates the estimation of the within-subject covariate effect, is robust to the between-subject confounders, and provides better evidence for the causal relationship than cross-sectional studies. However, this method of analysis is limited by compositional bias, and few statistical methods can estimate the effect of microbiota on host diseases with repeatedly measured 16S rRNA gene data. Herein, we propose mTMAT, which is applicable to longitudinal microbiome data and is robust to compositional bias.

resultsmTMAT normalized the microbial abundance and utilized the ratio of the pooled abundance for association analysis. mTMAT is based on generalized estimating equations with a robust variance estimator and can be applied to repeatedly measured microbiome data. The robustness of mTMAT against compositional bias is underscored by its utilization of abundance ratios.

conclusionsWith extensive simulation studies, we showed that mTMAT is statistically relatively powerful and is robust to compositional bias. mTMAT enables detection of microbial taxa associated with host diseases using repeatedly measured 16S rRNA gene data and can provide deeper insights into bacterial pathology.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaPhylogenyHumansRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16SMicrobiome dataMicrobiotaMTMATTree-based microbiome association test

Identifiers

PMID40050732
PMCPMC11887327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.