ArticleScientific reports2025
Modified protocol comparing sporicidal activity of different non-thermal plasma generating devices.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Due to the great increase in the non-thermal plasma (NTP) bio-applications, especially thanks to its antimicrobial properties, many types of NTP generating devices have been developed recently. However, a comparison of these devices is difficult due to the differences in the setup of studies testing them, e.g., in species of microorganisms used and sample preparations. In this study, we optimized a robust and reproducible standard protocol using Bacillus subtilis spores and applied it to compare seven different NTP generating devices in terms of technical parameters and sporicidal properties. Inhibition zones determined using the Aurora software and the complete inhibition of bacteria growth induced by the NTP treatment were analyzed to determine both local and overall effects, respectively. The highest sporicidal efficacy of the tested devices was achieved by the volume dielectric barrier discharge from Wroclaw, which inhibited 99.9% of colony forming units after 30 min of exposure. To our knowledge, a comparative study of this extent has not been published to date. The presented protocol is based on an established bacterial method and can therefore serve as a general standard for an effective comparison of NTP sources across laboratories worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.