Observational studyJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2025
Influence of HeartMate 3™ on Bispectral Index™ monitor: a retrospective observational study.
Observational study in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Electroencephalogram-derived monitors are affected by various artifacts. HeartMate 3™ operates at frequency bands that overlap with those used for calculating the electromyographic index (EMG) and bispectral index (BIS) on the Bispectral Index™ monitor. This study investigated whether HeartMate 3 elevates these values, a change not predicted with HeartMate II™. This retrospective observational study included data from patients who underwent HeartMate 3 or II implantation between April 2008 and December 2023 as extracted from our institutional database. Patient-wise median EMG and BIS were compared between the pre-LVAD period (from the start of surgery to initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass) and the post-LVAD period (from the end of cardiopulmonary bypass to end of surgery). Data were obtained from 33 and 43 patients who underwent HeartMate 3 and HeartMate II implantation, respectively. Patients with HeartMate 3 implantation showed significant elevation in the EMG (pre-LVAD, mean ± standard deviation, 26.1 ± 1.0 dB; post-LVAD, 39.5 ± 2.8 dB; P < 0.001) without a significant change in the BIS (pre-LVAD, 44.5 ± 8.1; post-LVAD, 45.5 ± 7.1; P = 0.35). In contrast, patients with HeartMate II implantation did not show significant changes in either the EMG (pre-LVAD, 26.1 ± 1.2 dB; post-LVAD, 27.1 ± 4.1 dB; P = 0.16) or BIS (pre-LVAD, 45.1 ± 9.2; post-LVAD, 43.0 ± 8.1; P = 0.071). HeartMate 3 significantly elevates EMG. Anesthesiologists should be aware of this to appropriately interpret EMG elevation in patients with HeartMate 3.Trial registration: Japan Registry for Clinical Trials identifier: jRCT1030230549 (date of registration: January 10, 2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.