ArticleThe AAPS journal2025
A Phase-Appropriate Risk Assessment Strategy in Support of the Safety of Peptide and Oligonucleotide-Related Impurities.
Article in The AAPS journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immunogenicity Assays Used in Support of Marketing Applications of Oligonucleotide Therapeutics.The AAPS journal · 2026Review
- Flavonoids as functional food-derived modulators of the gut microbiota-NF-κB axis in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2026Review
- Recent advances in analytical separation techniques for therapeutic oligonucleotides.Bioanalysis · 2025Review
- Immunogenicity of therapeutic peptide products: bridging the gaps regarding the role of product-related risk factors.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Stimuli-Responsive Nanoplatforms for Precision Intervention in Rheumatoid Arthritis.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is limited regulatory guidance that outlines the globally acceptable level of individual and total impurities present in peptide and oligonucleotide drug substances that can be supported and accepted during clinical testing. In early clinical development, there is uncertainty regarding the potential toxicological and immunogenicity risk of these impurities relative to the active pharmaceutical ingredient; however, as pharmaceutical development companies move closer to marketing applications, this uncertainty lessens through knowledge gained by clinical and toxicology studies. While these peptide and oligonucleotide related impurities are predicted to be under process control and to have the same safety profile as the parent drug substance, they do not offer any inherent advantages to the patient. Thus, the safety and specification control of these impurities is frequently challenged by regulatory agencies. In support of phase-appropriate control strategies, this manuscript presents a risk-based approach to evaluate the safety of peptide and oligonucleotide impurities from a toxicology and immunogenicity perspective. In many cases, the proposed safety threshold is higher than what is accepted by regulatory bodies, but still is expected to be safe based upon sound toxicological principles which should be the focus for clinical studies. The risk assessment strategies presented here consider the stage of development, indication, potential impact of unintended cross reactivity with endogenous proteins, dose, and frequency of dosing throughout development to inform chemistry manufacturing and control of inherent safety risks associated with API-related impurities. Importantly, for the first time, this manuscript establishes a threshold of immunogenicity concern along with an experimental mitigation plan specifically for peptide impurities as a function of the development phase.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40050561What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.