Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40050561›Full record

ArticleThe AAPS journal2025

A Phase-Appropriate Risk Assessment Strategy in Support of the Safety of Peptide and Oligonucleotide-Related Impurities.

Brian W Pack, Robert W Siegel, Paul D Cornwell, Andrea Ferrante, Douglas A Roepke, Michael E Hodsdon, Laurent Malherbe, Mark A Carfagna

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The AAPS journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Stimuli-Responsive Nanoplatforms for Precision Intervention in Rheumatoid Arthritis.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Brian W PackEli Lilly and Company Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA. pack_brian_w@lilly.com.ORCID 0009-0003-7142-6949
Robert W SiegelEli Lilly and Company Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Paul D CornwellEli Lilly and Company Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Andrea FerranteEli Lilly and Company Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Douglas A RoepkeEli Lilly and Company Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Michael E HodsdonEli Lilly and Company Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Laurent MalherbeEli Lilly and Company Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Mark A CarfagnaEli Lilly and Company Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is limited regulatory guidance that outlines the globally acceptable level of individual and total impurities present in peptide and oligonucleotide drug substances that can be supported and accepted during clinical testing. In early clinical development, there is uncertainty regarding the potential toxicological and immunogenicity risk of these impurities relative to the active pharmaceutical ingredient; however, as pharmaceutical development companies move closer to marketing applications, this uncertainty lessens through knowledge gained by clinical and toxicology studies. While these peptide and oligonucleotide related impurities are predicted to be under process control and to have the same safety profile as the parent drug substance, they do not offer any inherent advantages to the patient. Thus, the safety and specification control of these impurities is frequently challenged by regulatory agencies. In support of phase-appropriate control strategies, this manuscript presents a risk-based approach to evaluate the safety of peptide and oligonucleotide impurities from a toxicology and immunogenicity perspective. In many cases, the proposed safety threshold is higher than what is accepted by regulatory bodies, but still is expected to be safe based upon sound toxicological principles which should be the focus for clinical studies. The risk assessment strategies presented here consider the stage of development, indication, potential impact of unintended cross reactivity with endogenous proteins, dose, and frequency of dosing throughout development to inform chemistry manufacturing and control of inherent safety risks associated with API-related impurities. Importantly, for the first time, this manuscript establishes a threshold of immunogenicity concern along with an experimental mitigation plan specifically for peptide impurities as a function of the development phase.

Indexed as

Drug ContaminationOligonucleotidesPeptidesAnimalsHumansRisk AssessmentOligonucleotidesPeptidesanalytical control strategychemistry manufacturing and controlimmunogenicityoligonucleotide-Related Impuritiespeptide-Related Impuritiestoxicity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.