ArticlePediatric surgery international2025
Enrollment disparities in the PCPLC's patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) study.
Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatient-reported outcomes have become an important metric for assessing quality of life and long-term clinical status. The Pediatric Colorectal and Pelvic Learning Consortium (PCPLC) evaluates the quality of life of patients with congenital colorectal diagnoses through the PCPLC Patient (and Parent) Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) study. We sought to identify how socioeconomic disparities affect the enrollment rates of our patient population in the PROMs study.
methodsA multicenter, retrospective study of children evaluated at sites participating in the PCPLC PROMs study was performed. We evaluated associations of the participants' demographic information with screening, enrollment, and consent for the PROMs study.
resultsOf the 3505 participants enrolled in the PCPLC, 724 patients were eligible for the study. Demographics and enrollment practices varied by site. Hispanic ethnicity (p = 0.015) and public insurance (p = 0.013) were independently associated with lower enrollment, stratifying by site. Race was not independently associated with enrollment.
conclusionsThese results suggest that enrollment of participants into the PROMs study may be preferential for certain demographic groups, regardless of PCPLC site location and independent of demographic composition at each site. Further investigation is needed to develop strategies to ensure equitable screening and enrollment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40050522What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.