ReviewNature reviews. Drug discovery2025
Tumour-agnostic kinase inhibitors.
Review in Nature reviews. Drug discovery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Colorectal Cancer: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Signaling Pathways, Clinical Features, Screening, Diagnosis, and Management.MedComm · 2026Review
- Trials for Rare Cancers Are More Successful than those for Common Cancers.ESMO rare cancers · 2026Article
- ERBB2/HER2 landscape and prognostic impact: large-scale, real-world analysis across solid cancers.ESMO open · 2026Article
- The role of the molecular tumor board: learnings from the ROME trial.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- Article
- Molecular screening of natural compounds targeting KRAS(G12C): a multi-parametric strategy against acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Journal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry · 2025Article
- Cracking the resistance code: The molecular reclassification of cancer and precision therapy strategies.Seminars in cancer biology · 2025Review
- Bioactive Potential ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Inhibition of RPA32 and Cytotoxic Effects of the Carnivorous PlantPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Protein kinases are crucial targets for cancer treatment as they orchestrate important signals for oncogenesis and are often aberrantly activated owing to genomic alterations. In the past two decades, multiple kinase inhibitors have been developed, including those that are clinically effective regardless of tumour location, provided that the tumour harbours the aberrantly activated kinase. Consequently, a biomarker-based therapy model, untethered from tumour histology and organ of origin, has been established, which has led to transformative regulatory approvals of tumour-agnostic kinase inhibitors such as larotrectinib, selpercatinib, dabrafenib-trametinib and pemigatinib. However, almost all such approvals are partial in nature, as they do not include both solid and haematological cancers, even if the kinase inhibitor has shown activity in both. Moreover, clinical trials to assess these compounds are challenging because genomic sequencing of hundreds or thousands of tumours may be required to find eligible patients whose malignancy bears the targeted genetic alterations. In this Review, we describe the precision medicine paradigm that has successfully launched tumour-agnostic drug development, concentrating on small-molecule inhibitors that target kinase pathway aberrations, and we discuss the challenges in developing tumour-agnostic agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.