ArticleEarly intervention in psychiatry2025
Navigating the Maze: Caregiver Perspectives on Pathways to Mental Health Care for U.S. Youth at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis.
Article in Early intervention in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical High-Risk for Psychosis in Latinx Populations: Common Issues and Recommendations for Improving Care.Early intervention in psychiatry · 2026Review
- Behind the Gaps: A Narrative Review of Healthcare Barriers for Individuals with Serious Mental Illness.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimTreatment for youth who are at clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR-P) presents an opportunity for early intervention with the capacity to decrease the burden associated with a potential psychotic disorder later in life. However, significant barriers prevent youth at CHR-P from accessing speciality mental health services. Few studies have examined the pathways to care for youth at CHR-P within the U.S. health system.
methodsThe present study reports the results of a codebook thematic analysis of qualitative interviews conducted with caregivers (primarily parents) of 15 youth (ages 12-25 years) who entered a CHR-P speciality program. Using a semi-structured interview, we inquired about their experiences navigating the health system to eventually arrive at the speciality program, including help-seeking events and referrals, caregivers' attributions for youths' CHR-P symptoms, and barriers and facilitators to care.
resultsCaregivers reported confusion and uncertainty regarding the causes of symptoms. They also disclosed the significant challenges to obtaining mental health care, including low mental health literacy, illness stigma, provider unavailability or appropriateness and adequacy of referrals. Most of the youth had encounters with emergency services during their help-seeking journey.
conclusionOur results help define targets for future policy, research and clinical efforts to improve access to speciality care for youth at CHR-P in the U.S.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.