ReviewDiscover oncology2025
Beyond traditional biopsies: the emerging role of ctDNA and MRD on breast cancer diagnosis and treatment.
Review in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Liquid biopsy in modern medicine: advancing diagnostics from molecular insights to clinical practice.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Review
- Circulating tumor DNA-based minimal residual disease-guided adjuvant therapy in solid tumors: Current evidence, clinical trial frameworks, and future directions.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2026Article
- Review
- Review
- Circulating Tumor DNA in Breast Cancer: A Liquid Biopsy Revolution for Non-Invasive Genomic Profiling and Clinical Decision-Making.Breast cancer : basic and clinical research · 2026Review
- Genomic alterations and dynamic molecular residual disease monitoring predict pathological response to neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Beyond Imaging: Integrating Radiomics, Genomics, and Multi-Omics for Precision Breast Cancer Management.Cancers · 2025Review
- The impact of liquid biopsy in breast cancer: Redefining the landscape of non-invasive precision oncology.The journal of liquid biopsy · 2025Review
- Clinical Management of Circulating Tumor DNA in Breast Cancer: Detection, Prediction, and Monitoring.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2025Review
- Machine learning-enhanced discovery of tsRNA-mRNA regulatory networks: identifying novel diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets in breast cancer.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer management has traditionally relied on tissue biopsies and imaging, which offer limited insights into the disease. However, the discovery of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and minimal residual disease (MRD) detection has revolutionized our approach to breast cancer. ctDNA, which is fragmented tumor DNA found in the bloodstream, provides a minimally invasive way to understand the tumor's genomic landscape, revealing heterogeneity and critical mutations that biopsies may miss. MRD, which indicates cancer cells that remain after treatment, can now be detected using ctDNA and other advanced methods, improving our ability to predict disease recurrence. This allows for personalized adjuvant therapies based on individual MRD levels, avoiding unnecessary treatments for patients with low MRD. This review discusses how ctDNA and MRD represent a paradigm shift towards personalized, genomically guided cancer care, which has the potential to significantly improve patient outcomes in breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.