SynthesisSpinal cord2025
Treatments of fatigue after spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Spinal cord, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
STUDY
designSystematic Review and Meta-analysis.
settingCanada.
objectivesFatigue is one of the most common consequences of spinal cord injury (SCI). In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we examined interventions for fatigue in SCI and evaluated their effectiveness.
methodsMEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases were searched up to January 2024 inclusive. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed any intervention for at least one fatigue outcome in people with SCI were included. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool.
resultsInitial screening identified 282 studies from which six RCTs were included in the review (N = 249). One study found that moderate-intensity arm-crank exercise significantly improved fatigue compared to a control group (p = 0.036) with a large effect size (standard mean difference [SMD] = 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.10-2.00). Two studies assessing behavioral interventions found a moderate effect on fatigue (SMD = 0.46; 95% CI, -0.00-0.92; p = 0.05). Two studies did not find an effect of massage therapy on fatigue (SMD = 0.06; 95% CI, -0.38-0.50; p = 0.80). The risk of bias was classified as High for all but two of the RCTs.
conclusionsThese findings suggest that exercise and behavioral interventions promoting an active lifestyle may have a positive effect on fatigue. More research with larger sample sizes, including controls for co-morbid conditions like pain and depression, is needed to establish evidence-based treatments for reducing fatigue in people with SCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40050482What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.