ArticleLasers in medical science2025
A comparative evaluation of the efficacy of three commonly used diode lasers (810, 940, and 980-nanometer) to solder skin incisions: an experimental study in the rat.
Article in Lasers in medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The evolution of wound closure methods has led to the exploration of new and improved techniques such as laser tissue soldering. This study aimed to compare the effects of 810, 940, and 980 nm diode lasers and suturing to identify the most effective wavelength for soldering skin incisions. Three sets of incisions were bound on the backs of 63 rats using diode lasers and sutures. A combination of bovine serum albumin (50%), indocyanine green, and sodium hyaluronate was used as a solder. Healing progress was assessed on the 1st, 4th, 7th, 14th, and 21st days after surgery through histological examination and measurements of tensile strength. Although immediate superficial closure was found for the laser-bonded incisions, on the 4th day, the entire thickness of the incision was closed only in the 810 nm laser group. Thermal damage was observed for all the laser-irradiated groups. For the sutured group, the incisions remained unclosed for the first day, and openings through the incision were observed. The incisions treated with a 980 nm laser had the highest amount of tensile strength. At the end of the 21-day recovery period, no significant differences between experimental groups were observed in terms of the histological and tensile strength values. All studied diode lasers can effectively repair incisions similar to a suture, but the 980 nm treated incisions will be significantly more resistant to mechanical tension. The 810 nm diode laser demonstrated the earliest wound closure, which could benefit areas requiring more aesthetic consideration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40050471What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.