Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40050465›Full record

ArticleLearning & behavior2025

Common wall lizards learn familiar-unfamiliar identity of conspecifics through chemical cues.

Roberto Sacchi, Anita Curti, Paola Tassone, Benedetta Chiello, Stefano Scali, Marco Mangiacotti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Learning & behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Roberto SacchiDipartimento di Scienze della Terra e dell'Ambiente, Università degli Studi di Pavia, via Taramelli 24, 27100, Pavia, Italy. roberto.sacchi@unipv.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6199-0074
Anita CurtiDipartimento di Scienze della Terra e dell'Ambiente, Università degli Studi di Pavia, via Taramelli 24, 27100, Pavia, Italy.
Paola TassoneDipartimento di Scienze della Terra e dell'Ambiente, Università degli Studi di Pavia, via Taramelli 24, 27100, Pavia, Italy.
Benedetta ChielloDipartimento di Scienze della Terra e dell'Ambiente, Università degli Studi di Pavia, via Taramelli 24, 27100, Pavia, Italy.
Stefano ScaliMuseo di Storia Naturale di Milano, Corso Venezia, 55, 20121, Milano, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4318-751X
Marco MangiacottiDipartimento di Scienze della Terra e dell'Ambiente, Università degli Studi di Pavia, via Taramelli 24, 27100, Pavia, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7144-3851

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite numerous studies on individual recognition having been carried out on lizards, a clear demonstration that lizards are able to identify conspecifics is still lacking. Individual recognition in lizards involves identifying conspecifics based on distinctive characteristics, including physical, acoustic, and chemical cues. Lizards use specialized epidermal glands for intraspecific communication, which secrete a mixture of proteins and lipids. To demonstrate individual recognition, a training period needs to be devised to establish associations between traits and memories of interactions with other individuals. We thus performed a 3-week study on the common wall lizards (Podarcis muralis) to assess whether lizards are able to associate between previous experience with conspecifics and their chemical signals. Further, we investigated whether proteins played a role in this association. We acclimated 40 males to laboratory conditions during the first week. In the second week, we trained lizards to develop familiarity with odors (feces, urine, skin, femoral gland secretion) from previously unknown individuals. During the third week, we tested lizards by exposing them to odors from familiar and unfamiliar individuals. Lizards examined unfamiliar signals for longer in terms of time and frequency compared to familiar ones. These results form the basis of showing that lizards may be capable of recognizing conspecifics as different individuals, based on their chemical signals, even if the observed discrimination remains at the level of familiarity and unfamiliarity. The experiment does, however, demonstrate evidence of learned responses in common wall lizards.

Indexed as

CuesLizardsRecognition, PsychologyAnimalsMaleOdorantsChemical cueIndividual recognitionLearningSignal structure

Identifiers

PMID40050465
PMCPMC12408672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.