ReviewEuropean radiology2025
Image-guided percutaneous ablative treatments for renal cell carcinoma.
Review in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Perioperative functional and oncologic outcomes of percutaneous thermal ablation (PTA) versus robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for cT1 renal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Renal Cell Carcinoma in the Geriatric Population: Toward a Frailty-Adapted Therapeutic Paradigm.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Image-guided percutaneous ablation techniques for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma: a primer for radiologists.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- Article
- Safety, Efficacy, and Intermediate‑Term Outcomes of CT‑Guided Cryoablation of T1 Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Single‑Center Study.Journal of the Belgian Society of Radiology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent decades, percutaneous ablation procedures have evolved into a recognized treatment option for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Thermal ablation techniques, including radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation (MWA), and cryoablation (CA) are now incorporated in most treatment guidelines as a viable alternative, and in some cases, deemed equivalent to nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) or other surgical methods, especially for small renal masses (SRM) up to 4 cm. This review offers an overview of the most prevalent ablation techniques used to treat localized RCC. Additionally, it compares the oncological and clinical outcomes of these techniques with those of surgical options. Finally, it provides an assessment of the role that ablation treatment occupies in current guidelines. In conclusion, the use and incorporation of image-guided minimally invasive treatment options for RCC is on the rise. Existing data suggest that thermal ablation procedures (RFA, MWA, and CA) and partial nephrectomy yield comparable oncologic and clinical outcomes. Despite the data available, the recommendations for thermal ablations vary significantly across national and international guidelines. KEY POINTS: Question Despite growing evidence and integration in international guidelines, recommendations for ablative procedures in localized small renal cell cancer vary considerably. Findings Existing, mostly retrospective, data suggest that thermal ablation and partial nephrectomy yield comparable clinical results for small tumors. Clinical relevance Based on the current literature, thermal ablation of renal cell cancer up to 4 cm in size can be offered to patients as an alternative to surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.