Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40050452›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2025

Ten-year follow-up of degenerative spinal lesions on radiographs and MRI in axial spondyloarthritis: results of the DESIR (DEvenir des spondylarthropathies indifférenciées récentes) cohort.

Laura Pina Vegas, Miranda van Lunteren, Damien Loeuille, Caroline Morizot, Esther Newsum, Sofia Ramiro, Floris van Gaalen, Alain Saraux, Pascal Claudepierre, Antoine Feydy and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Laura Pina VegasDepartment of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. Laura.pinavegas@aphp.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2735-1148
Miranda van LunterenDepartment of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Damien LoeuilleDepartment of Rheumatology, CHU de Nancy, Nancy, France.
Caroline MorizotDepartment of Rheumatology, CHU de Nancy, Nancy, France.
Esther NewsumDepartment of Radiology, Nij Smellinghe, Drachten, The Netherlands.
Sofia RamiroDepartment of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Floris van GaalenDepartment of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Alain SarauxUniversité de Bretagne Occidentale (Univ Brest), Department of Rheumatology, CHU Brest, INSERM (U1227), LabEx IGO, Brest, Brest, France.
Pascal ClaudepierreDepartment of Rheumatology, CHU Henri Mondor, AP-HP, Créteil, France.
Antoine FeydyDepartment of musculoskeletal Radiology, CHU Cochin, AP-HP, Paris, France.
Désirée van der HeijdeDepartment of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Monique ReijnierseDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate the occurrence of spinal degenerative lesions (DL)s in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) inception cohort in radiographs and MRI over 10 years (10Y), to assess their changes over time and factors associated with them.

methodsWhole spine MRI and cervical and lumbar spine radiographs at baseline/5Y/10Y of patients with axSpA from the DESIR cohort were assessed for DLs by three readers. For descriptive analyses, DLs were defined by agreement between ≥ 2/3 readers or using the average of their assessments, at the patient level (≥ 1 lesion/patient). To assess the progression of DLs over time, we used multilevel generalised estimating equation models considering individual reader data.

resultsImaging was available for 330 patients (mean age 34 [9] years, 47% male). At baseline, 53% of patients had ≥ 1 DL on radiographs and 94% on MRI; 71% and 97% had DL at 10Y, respectively. The most frequent lesion on radiographs was disc height loss (baseline: 45% of patients, 10Y: 65%) and MRI disc degeneration (86%, 95%). Progression over time on radiographs was detected for osteophytes (change/Y: 2.34%, 95% CI: 1.92-2.75), disc height loss (1.37%, 0.95-1.80) and facet joint osteoarthritis (1.30%, 0.90-1.69) and on MRI for disc bulging/herniation (1.19%, 0.74-1.64), Modic type I (1.01%, 0.69-1.33) and II (0.94%, 0.66-1.22) lesions. We also observed a significant increase per year in the total number of DLs on radiographs (β: 1.81, 1.48-2.14) and MRI (β: 4.17, 3.49-4.84). Associated factors in both modalities were increasing BMI and bDMARDs exposure.

conclusionIn axSpA spinal DLs, though common, progress very slowly over 10Y. Faster progression is observed with increasing BMI and bDMARDs exposure (severe axSpA). KEY POINTS: Question The long-term evolution of spinal DLs in axSpA on radiographs and MRI, and the associated factors, is currently poorly understood. Findings Spinal DLs, although common, progress slowly over 10Y, but in patients with a higher BMI or exposed to bDMARDs, the progression is faster. Clinical relevance Understanding the progression of spinal DLs in axSpA helps to refine the interpretation of long-term imaging, limit diagnostic errors and optimise management strategies, particularly in patients with the highest risk of progression of these lesions.

Indexed as

Axial SpondyloarthritisMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultCohort StudiesDisease ProgressionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiographySpineAxial spondyloarthritisMagnetic resonance imagingOsteoarthritisSpineX-rays

Identifiers

PMID40050452
PMCPMC12350588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.