ReviewUnfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025
[Agonist-antagonist myoneural interface (AMI) : Innovative treatment option for lower limb amputees?]
Review in Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The agonist-antagonist myoneural interface (AMI) is an innovative approach to restoring proprioception and achieving more intuitive motor control following limb loss. This cutting-edge technique replicates the natural biomechanical relationship between agonist and antagonist muscles, enabling bidirectional communication between a prosthesis and the user's peripheral nervous system. Through the transposition of neurovascularly pedicled agonist-antagonist muscle pairs, which are reconnected via an adapted tendon suture and positioned within a gliding mechanism, AMI generates proprioceptive feedback during movement. Changes in tension within these muscle pairs produce signals that are transmitted to the central nervous system via afferent nerve pathways, enabling users to perceive the joint position of the limb that was originally governed by the muscle pair. This enhanced sensory input significantly facilitates control of the prosthesis. The AMI appears to enable an integration of the prosthesis into the body's existing neural networks and improve motor control of the prosthesis and the sensory discrimination. Compared to traditional surgical techniques (myodesis or myoplasty) with a purely mechanical transposition of residual stump muscles, AMI reduces the cognitive burden during the use of the prosthesis and delivers a more natural sense of movement, fostering a profound sense of embodiment. In summary, AMI represents a significant leap forward in human-machine integration. By enhancing both the functionality and user experience of prosthetic devices, it provides a very promising transformative solution for sustainable improvement of the quality of life for individuals living with limb loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.